open some issue and @them 2017-08-30 14:54 GMT+08:00 shiwen hu <[email protected]>:
> yes.nobody tell them. > > 2017-08-30 14:43 GMT+08:00 Henri Yandell <[email protected]>: > >> They're not committers, so I doubt anyone has requested they sign a ICLA. >> Looking at the GitHub history, some haven't been active in a while. >> >> Hen >> >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:07 PM, shiwen hu <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Maybe they don't know how to start the ICLA process.Consider creating a >> > boot page. >> > >> > 2017-08-30 13:06 GMT+08:00 Henri Yandell <[email protected]>: >> > >> > > (cc to John and Justin as they'd asked about this) >> > > >> > > Looking at the current MXNet GitHub contributors list (411 >> contributors): >> > > >> > > We have 36 signed CLAs at this point. >> > > >> > > Of the top 36 contributors, the following 15 top contributors aren't >> > > covered by a CLA: >> > > >> > > 8:sneakerkg >> > > 9:kevinthesun (post Incubation) >> > > 17:hjk41 >> > > 18:mavenlin >> > > 19:tornadomeet >> > > 20:winstywang >> > > 21:jermainewang >> > > 22:qiaohaijun >> > > 23:vchuravy >> > > 25:Roshrini (post Incubation) >> > > 26:howard0su >> > > 28:sbodenstein >> > > 31:ptrendx (post Incubation) >> > > 35:zackchase (post Incubation) >> > > 36:yanqingmen >> > > >> > > Note that some of these are post entering the Incubator. >> > > >> > > Some of the 411 contributors we should ask for CLA/SGs from. Those >> above >> > > are most likely the first to get agreements signed from, and we need >> to >> > > determine how far down the list to go. >> > > >> > > The git logs are trickier to use as they don't use the github login; >> so >> > > doing an analysis of the diffs themselves is trickier. >> > > >> > > Hen >> > > >> > >> > >
