Then who should represent the users who are using the forums but not the mail-list? I personally think it is a bit abuse use of the term "Apache way" to force our mind into the entire community... Maybe I am wrong..
Tianqi On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 9:39 PM, Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org> wrote: > Well, I do respect what you discussed in that meetup, if course. But for > those who weren't there, maybe the decision taken what a bit bias. > > In Apache we like to say that "if it didn't happen on the mailing list s, > it didn't happen" ;-) > > Look like there are different feelings about this. Should I cast a VOTE? > > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018, 21:27 Tianqi Chen <tqc...@cs.washington.edu> wrote: > > > I do think we are targeting all the community, but we must also agree > that > > the voice of users from the meetup is a representative sample of users' > > demand, and it is important that we respect that. > > > > Tianqi > > > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 9:25 PM, Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > Are we targeting just Seattle as our community? I really hope we are > > > thinking a bit beyond that... > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018, 21:22 Tianqi Chen <tqc...@cs.washington.edu> > > wrote: > > > > > > > I remember last time during the mxnet meetup in Seattle, we did a > > survey, > > > > and most users preferred the current discuss forum. So I would say we > > > stick > > > > with that given the user community prefers that > > > > > > > > Tianqi > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 9:13 PM, Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Then, if everybody agree, let's request the mailing list creation > to > > > > INFRA > > > > > ;-) > > > > > > > > > > Marco, I wouldn't do that. Typically developers are also subscribed > > > > there, > > > > > since they may be the most informed people for answering users' > > > > questions. > > > > > But the topics discussed there may not be of the interest for pure > > > > > development purposes. Some discussions will jump from users@ to > dev@ > > , > > > > but > > > > > at a different level. So I wouldn't forward one mailing list to the > > > > other. > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018, 21:01 Marco de Abreu > > > > > <marco.g.ab...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I think nobody was opposed to it in the past, right? > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd propose that all emails automatically get copied to dev@ to > > > ensure > > > > > > high > > > > > > visibility initially. What do you think? > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian <s...@apache.org> schrieb am Fr., 15. Juni 2018, 20:51: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have already proposed this many times in the past and would > > > > strongly > > > > > > > encourage it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -s > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 15.06.2018 21:56, Sergio Fernández wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is there any good reason why the podling doesn't have a > users@ > > > > > mailing > > > > > > > list > > > > > > > > yet? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Honestly speaking, I'm not a big fan of the other tools the > > > podling > > > > > is > > > > > > > > using. Slack and Web forums a cool tools, and I used them a > lot > > > in > > > > > > other > > > > > > > > contexts. But when it comes to transparency and community, > > > mailing > > > > > > lists > > > > > > > > play a crucial role in the Apache Way. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Users are the most important asset a project can have. Even > > more > > > > than > > > > > > > > developers, believe me. So I think it's time to create a > users@ > > > > > > mailing > > > > > > > > list for to helping MXNet grow its community beyong the core > > > team. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
