Hi Naveen, While your enthusiasm is certainly appreciated, next time, shall we include the "new Issue Type" in the discussion first? I found no prior mention on this.
Also, a reminder to everyone that next time, let's respect Apache Infra's time by following the instructions to have an Apache mentor to create issue after discussion, instead of "just create". Thanks. -sz On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 7:36 PM, Naveen Swamy <mnnav...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey All, just created a INFRA ticket(https://issues.apache.o > rg/jira/browse/INFRA-16805) requesting a new Issue Type "Office Hours" on > JIRA to better manage and support Office hours request. > > One feedback I received was that "Apache" was neither mentioned in the > discussion nor in the PROPOSAL on the wiki. This is a valid feedback and I > have fixed the PROPOSAL. > I propose the office hours under discussion should be explicitly called > "Apache MXNet Office hours". > > Also, Apache INFRA asked to create INFRA tickets only through mentors > > Can one of the mentors kindly help take this ticket forward. > > Thanks, Naveen > > > > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Pedro Larroy < > pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > Yes Naveen, I think you are saying exactly the same as I hinted. Sheng > also > > agreed with this. > > > > Pedro. > > > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 6:54 PM Naveen Swamy <mnnav...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I do not think there needs to be a distinction made for > > > support/office-hours by committer or contributors(in this case Amazon > > > employed contributors) -- correct me if I misunderstood your guess :). > > > Like I said, I would rather call it MXNet Office hours and categorize > the > > > kind of support that is offered, we might be able to find contributors > > > willing to do this in different parts of the world regardless of their > > day > > > job or not. > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 9:21 AM, Sheng Zha <szha....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > I'm guessing Mu's intention is to make it clear that such invitation > is > > > > extended by teams in Amazon/AWS instead of by committers, so as to > > avoid > > > > the confusion of the naming "MXNet SDK". Suggestions to achieve the > > same > > > > goal are welcome. > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > -sz > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 9:09 AM, Isabel Drost-Fromm < > isa...@apache.org > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 18/07/18 23:30, Mu Li wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> A minor suggestion: rename MXNet SDK to AWS MXNet SDK or Amazon > > MXNet > > > > SDK. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > What exactly is the Amazon MXNet SDK? What is the AWS MXNet SDK? > > > > > > > > > > Your suggestion triggered my question because: > > > > > > > > > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/#products > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Isabel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
