-1 “strive to meet consensus”? This seems to imply the consensus is the natural expected state. So in the case where someone submits that we should start a nuclear war, then our bylaws would state that we should all try to agree to start a nuclear war.
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 4:41 PM Tianqi Chen <tqc...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Carin: > Sorry for the last minute request, but given the way we write down the > PMC, committer privileges, I feel we need to add an additional line: > > - "PMC/committer should strive to be diplomatic and reach consensus with > discussion when possible." > > Since I don't really want us to give an impression of abusing veto > rights. > > Thanks! > Tianqi > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 3:47 PM Carin Meier <carinme...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > This vote is to adopt the document > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Become+an+Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+Committer+and+PPMC+Member+Proposal > > to replace the current document > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Becoming+a+Committer > > > > The dev discussion thread is here > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e61ffa26af374de7a99c475d406e462a00b26cfc1155e232198dd53e@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E > > > > The vote will be a procedural issue vote as defined > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > > > Votes on procedural issues follow the common format of majority rule > unless > > otherwise stated. That is, if there are more favourable votes than > > unfavourable ones, the issue is considered to have passed -- regardless > of > > the number of votes in each category. (If the number of votes seems too > > small to be representative of a community consensus, the issue is > typically > > not pursued. However, see the description of lazy consensus > > <https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus> for a > > modifying factor.) > > > > The vote will run until Friday Nov 2nd at 6:00 am EST > > > > Thanks, > > Carin > > >
