-0 but keep it in if you want On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 5:50 PM Chris Olivier <cjolivie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> or another example if something is downvoted, this also implies that after > a vote is over, it’s approprorate to continue pushing the subject trying to > just wear everyone down even though the outcome is clear. We’ve seen this > before, actually. > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 5:41 PM Chris Olivier <cjolivie...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> -1 “strive to meet consensus”? This seems to imply the consensus is the >> natural expected state. So in the case where someone submits that we should >> start a nuclear war, then our bylaws would state that we should all try to >> agree to start a nuclear war. >> >> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 4:41 PM Tianqi Chen <tqc...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi Carin: >>> Sorry for the last minute request, but given the way we write down >>> the >>> PMC, committer privileges, I feel we need to add an additional line: >>> >>> - "PMC/committer should strive to be diplomatic and reach consensus >>> with >>> discussion when possible." >>> >>> Since I don't really want us to give an impression of abusing veto >>> rights. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> Tianqi >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 3:47 PM Carin Meier <carinme...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > This vote is to adopt the document >>> > >>> > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Become+an+Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+Committer+and+PPMC+Member+Proposal >>> > to replace the current document >>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Becoming+a+Committer >>> > >>> > The dev discussion thread is here >>> > >>> > >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e61ffa26af374de7a99c475d406e462a00b26cfc1155e232198dd53e@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E >>> > >>> > The vote will be a procedural issue vote as defined >>> > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html >>> > >>> > Votes on procedural issues follow the common format of majority rule >>> unless >>> > otherwise stated. That is, if there are more favourable votes than >>> > unfavourable ones, the issue is considered to have passed -- >>> regardless of >>> > the number of votes in each category. (If the number of votes seems too >>> > small to be representative of a community consensus, the issue is >>> typically >>> > not pursued. However, see the description of lazy consensus >>> > <https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus> for a >>> > modifying factor.) >>> > >>> > The vote will run until Friday Nov 2nd at 6:00 am EST >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Carin >>> > >>> >>