Hi Steffen, thank you for the patience. #13905 passed the review and is merged now.
Hi Kellen, please also keep an eye on the corresponding changes on master branch. -tao -----Original Message----- From: kellen sunderland [mailto:kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 7:34 AM To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status Hey Steffen, thanks for allowing a little extra time to merge PRs. All my PRs are in. #13905 looks good to me, but we may want someone a little more familiar to MKLDNN / the ndarray.h file review as well. On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 11:53 AM Steffen Rochel <steffenroc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Still waiting for merge of > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13905 > > All other PR are merged and CI tests are passing. Please no more > changes on 1.4.x branch beside merge for PR 13905, so we can move > forward with 1.4.0 release. > > Best Regards, > Steffen > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 9:48 AM Steffen Rochel > <steffenroc...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Dear MXNet community - > > thanks for merging previously agreed PR's into v1.4.x branch. > > > > Kellen and Zhennan - what is the ETA for > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13905 ? Please try to > > merge today. > > > > Yuxi asked offline to merge > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13922 to complete > > Horovod integration. PR will be merged today. > > > > After above PR are merge and CI passed successfully 1.4.0.rc1 will > > be created and voting started. > > > > Regards, > > Steffen > > > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 2:34 PM kellen sunderland < > > kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Sounds good Steffen. I believe most of these PRs only fix > >> functional problems (they don't add features) and should be fairly low > >> risk. > >> > >> Update from my side: > >> 13695: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13899 <- > >> Already merged, thanks Haibin! > >> > >> Ready for review / merge with all tests passed: > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13898 > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13900 > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13897 > >> > >> -Kellen > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 10:06 PM Steffen Rochel < > steffenroc...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Kellen - thanks, please go ahead. I'm ok as long we avoid risky > >> > PR and > >> can > >> > get to a stable and tested build by Friday. > >> > > >> > Best, > >> > Steffen > >> > > >> > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 9:48 PM kellen sunderland < > >> > kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > > Many thanks for the license fixes and allowing some other PRs > >> > > to > come > >> > into > >> > > the release. > >> > > > >> > > For #13697 I've contacted the author Zhennan and let him know > >> > > he can > >> cut > >> > a > >> > > branch to v1.4.x to update any APIs that are required. > >> > > > >> > > For the other PRs listed here's some new PRs for the v1.4.x branch. > >> > > 13188: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13898 > >> > > 13727: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13900 > >> > > 13695: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13899 <- > >> Already > >> > > merged, thanks Haibin! > >> > > > >> > > I'd also propose that we include this TensorRT PR which fixes > >> inference > >> > > bugs and updates to a more stable commit of onnx-trt: > >> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13897 > >> > > > >> > > -Kellen > >> > > > >> > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 5:57 PM Steffen Rochel < > >> steffenroc...@gmail.com> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > Hi Lin - please go ahead to integrate into 1.4.x. > >> > > > Steffen > >> > > > > >> > > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 4:17 PM Lin Yuan > >> > > > <apefor...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > Hi Steffen, > >> > > > > > >> > > > > I would like to ask to include one more PR for 1.4.0.rc1: > >> > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13845 > >> > > > > > >> > > > > This PR exports exception handling API of MXNet. It is > >> > > > > needed by > >> > > Horovod > >> > > > > with MXNet integration to elegantly throw exception at > >> > > > > Python > >> level > >> > > > rather > >> > > > > than a C++ abort. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Lin > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 2:24 PM Steffen Rochel < > >> > > steffenroc...@gmail.com> > >> > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Dear MXNet community - > >> > > > > > Zach & friends made good progress resolving the licensing > >> issues. > >> > One > >> > > > > more > >> > > > > > PR on 1.4.x branch is expected today. > >> > > > > > The code freeze for 1.4.0.rc1 is Thursday Jan 17th 6pm PST. > >> > > > > > I'm asking the requester to add following PR to 1.4.x branch: > >> > > > > > Tao: > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13882 > >> > > > > > Kellen: > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13697 > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13188 > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13727 > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13695 > >> > > > > > Pedro: > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13535 > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > If there are additional PR to be considered for 1.4.0.rc1 > please > >> > send > >> > > > > > request to dev@. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Regards, > >> > > > > > Steffen > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 11:28 AM Qing Lan > >> > > > > > <lanking...@live.com > > > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Hi all, > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I added a section F in the document that explained the > current > >> > > > > > > static-linked dependencies we used for official > >> > > > > > > release. As > >> there > >> > > > are a > >> > > > > > few > >> > > > > > > licenses are under BSD3 and GPL, we need to handle them > >> > > > > > > in > our > >> > next > >> > > > > > > release. Please take a look and leave any concerns you > >> > > > > > > may > >> have. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Thanks, > >> > > > > > > Qing > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On 1/7/19, 8:33 PM, "kellen sunderland" < > >> > > > kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> > >> > > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > So I see two quick options that should cut down on > >> > > > > > > the > >> > > dependency > >> > > > > > > licenses > >> > > > > > > required for TRT in the source release. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > 1: We can simply remove in the release package the > >> submodules > >> > > for > >> > > > > > onnx > >> > > > > > > in > >> > > > > > > folder > >> > > > > > > > >> > > incubator-mxnet/3rdparty/onnx-tensorrt/third_party/onnx/third_party. > >> > > > > > > None of those dependencies are used in the build > >> > > > > > > (I've > >> just > >> > > > > verified > >> > > > > > > locally on my machine). > >> > > > > > > 2: We can make a cmake based checkout system and > >> > > > > > > ensure > we > >> > only > >> > > > > > > checkout > >> > > > > > > the required files when TRT builds are enabled > >> > > > > > > (similar > to > >> > the > >> > > > > > current > >> > > > > > > mkl-ml setup). > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I'd suggest option 1 for this release, and that we > support > >> > > > option 2 > >> > > > > > > for the > >> > > > > > > 1.5 release. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 8:19 PM Lv, Tao A < > >> tao.a...@intel.com > >> > > > >> > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > What should I do for the double headers in > >> > > > > > > 3rdparty/mkldnn/src/cpu/xbyak/? > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > -tao > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > >> > > > > > > > From: Steffen Rochel [mailto:steffenroc...@gmail.com] > >> > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2019 10:51 AM > >> > > > > > > > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > >> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Kellen and Tao - > >> > > > > > > > yes, the understanding is that dependencies need > >> > > > > > > to be > >> > > > considered > >> > > > > > > and all > >> > > > > > > > licences referenced to include in top level > >> > > > > > > LICENSE > >> file. > >> > > > > > > > Appreciate your help with it. > >> > > > > > > > Steffen > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 6:39 PM kellen sunderland < > >> > > > > > > > kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Sorry to hear about the licensing issues. I > >> > > > > > > was > >> > following > >> > > > the > >> > > > > > > general > >> > > > > > > > > vote but I'm still lacking some clarity around > >> > > > > > > what > >> > > licenses > >> > > > in > >> > > > > > the > >> > > > > > > > > onnx-trt repo need to be surfaced. I believe > >> onnx-trt is > >> > > MIT > >> > > > > > > > > licensed, but it includes Onnx as a third party > >> > > > > > > repo > >> > which > >> > > > then > >> > > > > > > brings > >> > > > > > > > > in dependencies with a variety of licenses. > >> > > > > > > The > >> proposal > >> > > is > >> > > > > that > >> > > > > > > we > >> > > > > > > > > look at these on an individual basis and then > >> > > > > > > add > >> them to > >> > > our > >> > > > > top > >> > > > > > > level > >> > > > > > > > LICENSE file right? > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > An alternative is that we may be able to > >> > > > > > > checkout a > >> > smaller > >> > > > > > source > >> > > > > > > > > code dependency tree if we remove a few > >> > > > > > > unneeded > >> ONNX's > >> > > > > > > dependencies > >> > > > > > > > > (pybind and google-bench). My hope is that > >> > > > > > > this > >> wouldn't > >> > > > > affect > >> > > > > > > our > >> > > > > > > > > compilation process and would get us down to > >> > > > > > > two > >> licenses > >> > > to > >> > > > > > report > >> > > > > > > > > (just Onnx and Onnx-TRT, both MIT). > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 6:07 PM Meghna Baijal > >> > > > > > > > > <meghnabaijal2...@gmail.com> > >> > > > > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Hi All, > >> > > > > > > > > > For some more context, these were the last > >> > > > > > > emails > I > >> > sent > >> > > on > >> > > > > the > >> > > > > > > dev > >> > > > > > > > > > and legal lists requesting help on the open > >> questions > >> > – > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > 1. Question on legal about the CC-By-2.5 < > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201805.m > >> box > >> > > > > > > > > > /%3CCAK1xzDe6ECToKt_2cTR_7txQQCwHeYfvxXDfmuGgfA3jaTs= > >> > > > > > > j...@mail.gmail.com > >> > > > > > > > > %3E > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > 2. Question on dev about googletest file < > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mxnet-dev/201804.mbox/%3CC > >> AMG > >> > > > > > > > > gKDC8szdfFqQhhSNpwwT_3zi4LBS7A= > >> > > > u4v7kj4ule44u...@mail.gmail.com > >> > > > > > %3E > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > 3. General Request for review of the licenses > wiki < > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mxnet-dev/201801.mbox/%3C > >> CAM > >> > > > > > > > > GgKDCi=s933zcVWwei15i5uBC1h88VUogt3Br=Vq28= > >> > > > > vi...@mail.gmail.com > >> > > > > > %3E > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > (Note: You can click on the the “>>” next to > >> > > > > > > the > >> > thread > >> > > on > >> > > > > the > >> > > > > > > top > >> > > > > > > > > > right to view the next responses in the email > >> threads > >> > in > >> > > > the > >> > > > > > > apache > >> > > > > > > > > > archive. ) > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > >> > > > > > > > > > Meghna Baijal > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 4:30 PM Steffen Rochel > >> > > > > > > > > > <steffenroc...@gmail.com> > >> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Dear MXNet community - > >> > > > > > > > > > > as you should have seen in previous email, > voting > >> for > >> > > > > > > v1.4.0.rc0 > >> > > > > > > > > > > has > >> > > > > > > > > been > >> > > > > > > > > > > cancelled. We received a -1 vote due to > >> outstanding > >> > > > license > >> > > > > > > issues. > >> > > > > > > > > > > Please help to update > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet+Source+Lice > >> nse > >> > > > > > > > > s > >> > > > > > > > > > > and > >> > > > > > > > > > > resolve outstanding issues. > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > I would like to ask specifically for help > >> > > > > > > from > >> > > > contributors > >> > > > > > to > >> > > > > > > > > > > mkldnn, opemmp and onnx-tensorrt to address > >> > > > > > > the > >> > > feedback > >> > > > > from > >> > > > > > > > > > > Justin - see > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ebb8c4c00fb66dd98da13621c7dcb8 > >> 753 > >> > > > > > > > > fee57562a861d61379d31e9@% > >> 3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org > >> > %3E > >> > > > > > > > > > > . > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > I suggest to fix the issues first on > >> > > > > > > master, > then > >> > > > > cherry-pick > >> > > > > > > and > >> > > > > > > > > > > merge > >> > > > > > > > > > to > >> > > > > > > > > > > 1.4.x branch. > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > I'm suggesting to exclude Julia from 1.4.0 > >> release as > >> > > > > > > integration > >> > > > > > > > > > > into MXNet repo and upgrade to 0.7+ is WIP. > >> > > > > > > > > > > I'm suggesting to exclude > >> > > > > > > googletest/googlemock > >> from > >> > > > 1.4.0 > >> > > > > > > release > >> > > > > > > > > > > as outstanind license issues are not > >> > > > > > > resolved > yet. > >> > This > >> > > > > > should > >> > > > > > > not > >> > > > > > > > > > > impact users. > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Please provide your feedback to the suggestions. > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > >> > > > > > > > > > > Steffen > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 1:34 PM Steffen Rochel < > >> > > > > > > > > steffenroc...@gmail.com> > >> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear MXNet community - > >> > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you have seen that voting for > v1.4.0.rc0 > >> has > >> > > > > started > >> > > > > > > and > >> > > > > > > > > > > > will continue until December 27th noon. > >> > > > > > > So far > >> two > >> > > > > binding > >> > > > > > +1 > >> > > > > > > > votes. > >> > > > > > > > > > > > I suggesting the following schedule to > >> > > > > > > account > >> for > >> > > > > holidays > >> > > > > > > and > >> > > > > > > > > > > > of > >> > > > > > > > > > course > >> > > > > > > > > > > > depending on voting feedback. > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Vote on dev@ until 12/27 > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Vote on general@ 12/28 – 1/3 > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Release announcement with pre-build > >> > > > > > > language > >> > bindings > >> > > > 1/9 > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Please let me know if you have concerns > >> > > > > > > with > the > >> > > > proposed > >> > > > > > > schedule. > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Steffen > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 11:22 AM Haibin Lin < > >> > > > > > > > > haibin.lin....@gmail.com> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> Hi Steffen, > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> Aston and I would like to bring this PR > >> > > > > > > to > your > >> > > > > attention: > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13686, > >> > > > > > > where Zhi > >> > > > > > > > > fixed > >> > > > > > > > > > > the > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> num_worker argument of DataLoader on windows. > >> > > Without > >> > > > > this > >> > > > > > > fix, > >> > > > > > > > > using > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> DataLoader with num_worker > 0 would > >> > > > > > > result > in > >> > crash > >> > > > on > >> > > > > > > Windows. > >> > > > > > > > > > > Bringing > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> this PR to 1.4.x would greatly benefit > windows > >> > users > >> > > > of > >> > > > > > > MXNet. > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> Aston > >> > > > > > > > > > is > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> working on the dive into deep learning book > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> <http://diveintodeeplearning.org> based > >> > > > > > > on > >> MXNet, > >> > > > which > >> > > > > > is > >> > > > > > > due > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> and > >> > > > > > > > > > > frozen > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> for publication next week. Currently the > >> > > > > > > book > >> will > >> > > > > depend > >> > > > > > on > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> MXNet > >> > > > > > > > > > 1.4.0 > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> and discourages readers from using > multi-worker > >> > > > > > DataLoaders > >> > > > > > > due > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> to > >> > > > > > > > > > this > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> bug > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> on Windows. With this fix Aston can > >> > > > > > > update > the > >> > > > examples > >> > > > > in > >> > > > > > > the > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> book > >> > > > > > > > > > with > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> DataLoader using multiple workers, which > >> > > > > > > will > >> be > >> > > very > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> beneficial to > >> > > > > > > > > > the > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> broader MXNet community. > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> Best, > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> Haibin > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 6:11 AM Pedro > >> > > > > > > Larroy > < > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > Hi Steffen > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > Added some notes in your PR for the > >> > > > > > > release > >> > notes. > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > In particular, I'm a bit concerned > >> > > > > > > about > the > >> > > status > >> > > > of > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > topology > >> > > > > > > > > > aware > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > communication, since it has open > >> > > > > > > issues and > >> is > >> > not > >> > > > > being > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > tested in > >> > > > > > > > > > CI. > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > (The tests also fail). I think we > >> > > > > > > should > >> anounce > >> > > it > >> > > > > when > >> > > > > > > it's > >> > > > > > > > > > working > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > properly and it's well tested. > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > Pedro. > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:06 AM > >> > > > > > > Steffen > >> Rochel > >> > < > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> steffenroc...@gmail.com> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > wrote: > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Dear MXNet community - > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > all issues beside one > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > < > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/13438 > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > have > >> > > > > > > > > > been > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > addressed. I suggest to document the > >> > > > > > > last > >> > > > remaining > >> > > > > > > issue > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > as > >> > > > > > > > > known > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > problem > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > and move forward with the release. > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Please communicate if you have > >> > > > > > > concerns > of > >> > know > >> > > > > about > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > critical > >> > > > > > > > > > > issues > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> to > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > be > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > addressed before starting vote about > >> releasing > >> > > > 1.4.0 > >> > > > > > as > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > soon as > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> possible. > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Please also have a look at the > >> > > > > > > release > >> notes < > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28i > >> ncu > >> > > > > > > > > bating%29+1.4.0+Release+Notes > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > and provide feedback. > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > I'm planing to start voting > >> > > > > > > beginning of > >> next > >> > > > week. > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Steffen > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 8:31 PM > >> > > > > > > Steffen > >> Rochel > >> > < > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> steffenroc...@gmail.com> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Hi Pedro - this are indeed the > >> > > > > > > draft > >> release > >> > > > notes > >> > > > > > for > >> > > > > > > > v1.4.0. > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> Please > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > add > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > description as you suggested. > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > All - please have a look at the > >> > > > > > > release > >> > notes > >> > > > and > >> > > > > > > provide > >> > > > > > > > > > feedback > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> and > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > suggestions.. > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Steffen > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > On Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 3:30 AM > >> > > > > > > Zhao, > >> Patric > >> > < > >> > > > > > > > > > > patric.z...@intel.com> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > wrote: > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> Hi Steffen, > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> I saw the draft of 1.4 release > >> > > > > > > notes > in > >> > here > >> > > ( > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28i > >> ncu > >> > > > > > > > > bating%29+1.4.0+Release+Notes > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> ). > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> Is this near the final version? > >> > > > > > > I'd > >> like > >> > to > >> > > > add > >> > > > > > some > >> > > > > > > > > > > descriptions > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> of > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > new > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> quantization features enabled in 1.4. > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> Is it OK? > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> Thanks, > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> --Patric > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > -----Original Message----- > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > From: Steffen Rochel [mailto: > >> > > > > > > steffenroc...@gmail.com] > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > Sent: Saturday, December 8, > >> > > > > > > 2018 > 1:12 > >> AM > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > Subject: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 > >> > > > > > > release > >> > status > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > Dear MXNet community - I would > >> > > > > > > like > to > >> > > > provide > >> > > > > > > update > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > on v1.4.0 status, details > >> > > > > > > > > are > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> tracked > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> here > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > < > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+ > >> > > %28i > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > ncubating%29+1.4.0+Release+Plan+and+Status> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > . > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > Thank you very much for > >> > > > > > > everybody > >> effort > >> > to > >> > > > > > resolve > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > the > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> identified > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> issues. > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > We are down to 3 open issues - > >> > > > > > > for > >> > details > >> > > > > please > >> > > > > > > see > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28in > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > cubating%29+1. > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > 4.0 > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > +Release+Plan+and+Status#ApacheMXNet(incubating)1.4.0ReleasePla > >> > > +Release+Plan+and+nandS > >> > > > > > > > > > +Release+Plan+and+t > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > atu > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > +Release+Plan+and+s-OpenPRstotrack > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > < > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+ > >> > > %28i > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > ncubating%29+1.4.0+Release+Plan+and+Status#ApacheMXNet(incubating)1. > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> 4.0ReleasePlanandStatus-OpenPRstotrack> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > Please help to resolve the > >> > > > > > > remaining > >> > issues > >> > > > and > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > integrate > >> > > > > > > > > to > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> v1.4.x > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> branch. > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > Current estimate to address the > >> > identified > >> > > > > > security > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> vulnerabilities > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > in > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> the > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > Scala/Java package and merge > >> > > > > > > into > >> v1.4.x > >> > > > branch > >> > > > > > is > >> > > > > > > end > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > of > >> > > > > > > > > > next > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> week > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > (December 14th) I will > >> > > > > > > communicate > as > >> > soon > >> > > I > >> > > > > have > >> > > > > > > more > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> information. > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > Regards, > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > Steffen > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >
