Will do.  Thanks for getting it in Tao.

On Mon, Jan 21, 2019, 2:14 AM Lv, Tao A <tao.a...@intel.com wrote:

> Hi Steffen, thank you for the patience. #13905 passed the review and is
> merged now.
>
> Hi Kellen, please also keep an eye on the corresponding changes on master
> branch.
>
> -tao
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: kellen sunderland [mailto:kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 7:34 AM
> To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status
>
> Hey Steffen, thanks for allowing a little extra time to merge PRs.  All my
> PRs are in.  #13905 looks good to me, but we may want someone a little more
> familiar to MKLDNN / the ndarray.h file review as well.
>
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 11:53 AM Steffen Rochel <steffenroc...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Still waiting for merge of
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13905
> >
> > All other PR are merged and CI tests are passing. Please no more
> > changes on 1.4.x branch beside merge for PR 13905, so we can move
> > forward with 1.4.0 release.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Steffen
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 9:48 AM Steffen Rochel
> > <steffenroc...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Dear MXNet community -
> > > thanks for merging previously agreed PR's into v1.4.x branch.
> > >
> > > Kellen and Zhennan - what is the ETA for
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13905 ? Please try to
> > > merge today.
> > >
> > > Yuxi asked offline to merge
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13922 to complete
> > > Horovod integration. PR will be merged today.
> > >
> > > After above PR are merge and CI passed successfully 1.4.0.rc1 will
> > > be created and voting started.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Steffen
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 2:34 PM kellen sunderland <
> > > kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Sounds good Steffen.  I believe most of these PRs only fix
> > >> functional problems (they don't add features) and should be fairly
> low risk.
> > >>
> > >> Update from my side:
> > >> 13695: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13899 <-
> > >> Already merged, thanks Haibin!
> > >>
> > >> Ready for review / merge with all tests passed:
> > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13898
> > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13900
> > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13897
> > >>
> > >> -Kellen
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 10:06 PM Steffen Rochel <
> > steffenroc...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Kellen - thanks, please go ahead. I'm ok as long we avoid risky
> > >> > PR and
> > >> can
> > >> > get to a stable and tested build by Friday.
> > >> >
> > >> > Best,
> > >> > Steffen
> > >> >
> > >> > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 9:48 PM kellen sunderland <
> > >> > kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Many thanks for the license fixes and allowing some other PRs
> > >> > > to
> > come
> > >> > into
> > >> > > the release.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > For #13697 I've contacted the author Zhennan and let him know
> > >> > > he can
> > >> cut
> > >> > a
> > >> > > branch to v1.4.x to update any APIs that are required.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > For the other PRs listed here's some new PRs for the v1.4.x
> branch.
> > >> > > 13188: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13898
> > >> > > 13727: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13900
> > >> > > 13695: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13899 <-
> > >> Already
> > >> > > merged, thanks Haibin!
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I'd also propose that we include this TensorRT PR which fixes
> > >> inference
> > >> > > bugs and updates to a more stable commit of onnx-trt:
> > >> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13897
> > >> > >
> > >> > > -Kellen
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 5:57 PM Steffen Rochel <
> > >> steffenroc...@gmail.com>
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Hi Lin - please go ahead to integrate into 1.4.x.
> > >> > > > Steffen
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 4:17 PM Lin Yuan
> > >> > > > <apefor...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > Hi Steffen,
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > I would like to ask to include one more PR for 1.4.0.rc1:
> > >> > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13845
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > This PR exports exception handling API of MXNet. It is
> > >> > > > > needed by
> > >> > > Horovod
> > >> > > > > with MXNet integration to elegantly throw exception at
> > >> > > > > Python
> > >> level
> > >> > > > rather
> > >> > > > > than a C++ abort.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Thanks,
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Lin
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 2:24 PM Steffen Rochel <
> > >> > > steffenroc...@gmail.com>
> > >> > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Dear MXNet community -
> > >> > > > > > Zach & friends made good progress resolving the licensing
> > >> issues.
> > >> > One
> > >> > > > > more
> > >> > > > > > PR on 1.4.x branch is expected today.
> > >> > > > > > The code freeze for 1.4.0.rc1 is Thursday Jan 17th 6pm PST.
> > >> > > > > > I'm asking the requester to add following PR to 1.4.x
> branch:
> > >> > > > > > Tao:
> > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13882
> > >> > > > > > Kellen:
> > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13697
> > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13188
> > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13727
> > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13695
> > >> > > > > > Pedro:
> > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13535
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > If there are additional PR to be considered for 1.4.0.rc1
> > please
> > >> > send
> > >> > > > > > request to dev@.
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Regards,
> > >> > > > > > Steffen
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 11:28 AM Qing Lan
> > >> > > > > > <lanking...@live.com
> > >
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > Hi all,
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > I added a section F in the document that explained the
> > current
> > >> > > > > > > static-linked dependencies we used for official
> > >> > > > > > > release. As
> > >> there
> > >> > > > are a
> > >> > > > > > few
> > >> > > > > > > licenses are under BSD3 and GPL, we need to handle them
> > >> > > > > > > in
> > our
> > >> > next
> > >> > > > > > > release. Please take a look and leave any concerns you
> > >> > > > > > > may
> > >> have.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > >> > > > > > > Qing
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > On 1/7/19, 8:33 PM, "kellen sunderland" <
> > >> > > > kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com>
> > >> > > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     So I see two quick options that should cut down on
> > >> > > > > > > the
> > >> > > dependency
> > >> > > > > > > licenses
> > >> > > > > > >     required for TRT in the source release.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     1: We can simply remove in the release package the
> > >> submodules
> > >> > > for
> > >> > > > > > onnx
> > >> > > > > > > in
> > >> > > > > > >     folder
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > >
> incubator-mxnet/3rdparty/onnx-tensorrt/third_party/onnx/third_party.
> > >> > > > > > >     None of those dependencies are used in the build
> > >> > > > > > > (I've
> > >> just
> > >> > > > > verified
> > >> > > > > > >     locally on my machine).
> > >> > > > > > >     2: We can make a cmake based checkout system and
> > >> > > > > > > ensure
> > we
> > >> > only
> > >> > > > > > > checkout
> > >> > > > > > >     the required files when TRT builds are enabled
> > >> > > > > > > (similar
> > to
> > >> > the
> > >> > > > > > current
> > >> > > > > > >     mkl-ml setup).
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     I'd suggest option 1 for this release, and that we
> > support
> > >> > > > option 2
> > >> > > > > > > for the
> > >> > > > > > >     1.5 release.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 8:19 PM Lv, Tao A <
> > >> tao.a...@intel.com
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > What should I do for the double headers in
> > >> > > > > > > 3rdparty/mkldnn/src/cpu/xbyak/?
> > >> > > > > > >     >
> > >> > > > > > >     > -tao
> > >> > > > > > >     >
> > >> > > > > > >     > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > > > > > >     > From: Steffen Rochel [mailto:
> steffenroc...@gmail.com]
> > >> > > > > > >     > Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2019 10:51 AM
> > >> > > > > > >     > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
> > >> > > > > > >     > Subject: Re: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status
> > >> > > > > > >     >
> > >> > > > > > >     > Kellen and Tao -
> > >> > > > > > >     > yes, the understanding is that dependencies need
> > >> > > > > > > to be
> > >> > > > considered
> > >> > > > > > > and all
> > >> > > > > > >     > licences referenced to include in top level
> > >> > > > > > > LICENSE
> > >> file.
> > >> > > > > > >     > Appreciate your help with it.
> > >> > > > > > >     > Steffen
> > >> > > > > > >     >
> > >> > > > > > >     > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 6:39 PM kellen sunderland <
> > >> > > > > > >     > kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >     >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > Sorry to hear about the licensing issues.  I
> > >> > > > > > > was
> > >> > following
> > >> > > > the
> > >> > > > > > > general
> > >> > > > > > >     > > vote but I'm still lacking some clarity around
> > >> > > > > > > what
> > >> > > licenses
> > >> > > > in
> > >> > > > > > the
> > >> > > > > > >     > > onnx-trt repo need to be surfaced.  I believe
> > >> onnx-trt is
> > >> > > MIT
> > >> > > > > > >     > > licensed, but it includes Onnx as a third party
> > >> > > > > > > repo
> > >> > which
> > >> > > > then
> > >> > > > > > > brings
> > >> > > > > > >     > > in dependencies with a variety of licenses.
> > >> > > > > > > The
> > >> proposal
> > >> > > is
> > >> > > > > that
> > >> > > > > > > we
> > >> > > > > > >     > > look at these on an individual basis and then
> > >> > > > > > > add
> > >> them to
> > >> > > our
> > >> > > > > top
> > >> > > > > > > level
> > >> > > > > > >     > LICENSE file right?
> > >> > > > > > >     > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > An alternative is that we may be able to
> > >> > > > > > > checkout a
> > >> > smaller
> > >> > > > > > source
> > >> > > > > > >     > > code dependency tree if we remove a few
> > >> > > > > > > unneeded
> > >> ONNX's
> > >> > > > > > > dependencies
> > >> > > > > > >     > > (pybind and google-bench).  My hope is that
> > >> > > > > > > this
> > >> wouldn't
> > >> > > > > affect
> > >> > > > > > > our
> > >> > > > > > >     > > compilation process and would get us down to
> > >> > > > > > > two
> > >> licenses
> > >> > > to
> > >> > > > > > report
> > >> > > > > > >     > > (just Onnx and Onnx-TRT, both MIT).
> > >> > > > > > >     > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 6:07 PM Meghna Baijal
> > >> > > > > > >     > > <meghnabaijal2...@gmail.com>
> > >> > > > > > >     > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >     > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > Hi All,
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > For some more context, these were the last
> > >> > > > > > > emails
> > I
> > >> > sent
> > >> > > on
> > >> > > > > the
> > >> > > > > > > dev
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > and legal lists requesting help on the open
> > >> questions
> > >> > –
> > >> > > > > > >     > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > 1. Question on legal about the CC-By-2.5 <
> > >> > > > > > >     > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201805.m
> > >> box
> > >> > > > > > >     > >
> > /%3CCAK1xzDe6ECToKt_2cTR_7txQQCwHeYfvxXDfmuGgfA3jaTs=
> > >> > > > > > > j...@mail.gmail.com
> > >> > > > > > >     > > %3E
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > 2. Question on dev about googletest file <
> > >> > > > > > >     > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mxnet-dev/201804.mbox/%3CC
> > >> AMG
> > >> > > > > > >     > > gKDC8szdfFqQhhSNpwwT_3zi4LBS7A=
> > >> > > > u4v7kj4ule44u...@mail.gmail.com
> > >> > > > > > %3E
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > 3. General Request for review of the licenses
> > wiki <
> > >> > > > > > >     > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mxnet-dev/201801.mbox/%3C
> > >> CAM
> > >> > > > > > >     > > GgKDCi=s933zcVWwei15i5uBC1h88VUogt3Br=Vq28=
> > >> > > > > vi...@mail.gmail.com
> > >> > > > > > %3E
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > >  (Note: You can click on the the “>>” next to
> > >> > > > > > > the
> > >> > thread
> > >> > > on
> > >> > > > > the
> > >> > > > > > > top
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > right to view the next responses in the email
> > >> threads
> > >> > in
> > >> > > > the
> > >> > > > > > > apache
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > archive. )
> > >> > > > > > >     > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > Thanks,
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > Meghna Baijal
> > >> > > > > > >     > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 4:30 PM Steffen Rochel
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > <steffenroc...@gmail.com>
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >     > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > Dear MXNet community -
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > as you should have seen in previous email,
> > voting
> > >> for
> > >> > > > > > > v1.4.0.rc0
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > has
> > >> > > > > > >     > > been
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > cancelled. We received a -1 vote due to
> > >> outstanding
> > >> > > > license
> > >> > > > > > > issues.
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > Please help to update
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet+Source+Lice
> > >> nse
> > >> > > > > > >     > > s
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > and
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > resolve outstanding issues.
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > I would like to ask specifically for help
> > >> > > > > > > from
> > >> > > > contributors
> > >> > > > > > to
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > mkldnn, opemmp and onnx-tensorrt to address
> > >> > > > > > > the
> > >> > > feedback
> > >> > > > > from
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > Justin - see
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ebb8c4c00fb66dd98da13621c7dcb8
> > >> 753
> > >> > > > > > >     > > fee57562a861d61379d31e9@%
> > >> 3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org
> > >> > %3E
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > .
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > I suggest to fix the issues first on
> > >> > > > > > > master,
> > then
> > >> > > > > cherry-pick
> > >> > > > > > > and
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > merge
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > to
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > 1.4.x branch.
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > I'm suggesting to exclude Julia from 1.4.0
> > >> release as
> > >> > > > > > > integration
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > into MXNet repo and upgrade to 0.7+ is WIP.
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > I'm suggesting to exclude
> > >> > > > > > > googletest/googlemock
> > >> from
> > >> > > > 1.4.0
> > >> > > > > > > release
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > as outstanind license issues are not
> > >> > > > > > > resolved
> > yet.
> > >> > This
> > >> > > > > > should
> > >> > > > > > > not
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > impact users.
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > Please provide your feedback to the
> suggestions.
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > Regards,
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > Steffen
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 1:34 PM Steffen
> Rochel <
> > >> > > > > > >     > > steffenroc...@gmail.com>
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > > Dear MXNet community -
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > > I hope you have seen that voting for
> > v1.4.0.rc0
> > >> has
> > >> > > > > started
> > >> > > > > > > and
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > > will continue until December 27th noon.
> > >> > > > > > > So far
> > >> two
> > >> > > > > binding
> > >> > > > > > +1
> > >> > > > > > >     > votes.
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > > I suggesting the following schedule to
> > >> > > > > > > account
> > >> for
> > >> > > > > holidays
> > >> > > > > > > and
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > > of
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > course
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > > depending on voting feedback.
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > > Vote on dev@ until 12/27
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > > Vote on general@ 12/28 – 1/3
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > > Release announcement with pre-build
> > >> > > > > > > language
> > >> > bindings
> > >> > > > 1/9
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > > Please let me know if you have concerns
> > >> > > > > > > with
> > the
> > >> > > > proposed
> > >> > > > > > > schedule.
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > > Regards,
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > > Steffen
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 11:22 AM Haibin Lin
> <
> > >> > > > > > >     > > haibin.lin....@gmail.com>
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> Hi Steffen,
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> Aston and I would like to bring this PR
> > >> > > > > > > to
> > your
> > >> > > > > attention:
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >>
> > >> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13686,
> > >> > > > > > > where Zhi
> > >> > > > > > >     > > fixed
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > the
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> num_worker argument of DataLoader on
> windows.
> > >> > > Without
> > >> > > > > this
> > >> > > > > > > fix,
> > >> > > > > > >     > > using
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> DataLoader with num_worker > 0 would
> > >> > > > > > > result
> > in
> > >> > crash
> > >> > > > on
> > >> > > > > > > Windows.
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > Bringing
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> this PR to 1.4.x would greatly benefit
> > windows
> > >> > users
> > >> > > > of
> > >> > > > > > > MXNet.
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> Aston
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > is
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> working on the dive into deep learning book
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> <http://diveintodeeplearning.org> based
> > >> > > > > > > on
> > >> MXNet,
> > >> > > > which
> > >> > > > > > is
> > >> > > > > > > due
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> and
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > frozen
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> for publication next week. Currently the
> > >> > > > > > > book
> > >> will
> > >> > > > > depend
> > >> > > > > > on
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> MXNet
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > 1.4.0
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> and discourages readers from using
> > multi-worker
> > >> > > > > > DataLoaders
> > >> > > > > > > due
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> to
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > this
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> bug
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> on Windows. With this fix Aston can
> > >> > > > > > > update
> > the
> > >> > > > examples
> > >> > > > > in
> > >> > > > > > > the
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> book
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > with
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> DataLoader using multiple workers, which
> > >> > > > > > > will
> > >> be
> > >> > > very
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> beneficial to
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > the
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> broader MXNet community.
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> Best,
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> Haibin
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 6:11 AM Pedro
> > >> > > > > > > Larroy
> > <
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com>
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > Hi Steffen
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > Added some notes in your PR for the
> > >> > > > > > > release
> > >> > notes.
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > In particular, I'm a bit concerned
> > >> > > > > > > about
> > the
> > >> > > status
> > >> > > > of
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > topology
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > aware
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > communication, since it has open
> > >> > > > > > > issues and
> > >> is
> > >> > not
> > >> > > > > being
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > tested in
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > CI.
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > (The tests also fail). I think we
> > >> > > > > > > should
> > >> anounce
> > >> > > it
> > >> > > > > when
> > >> > > > > > > it's
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > working
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > properly and it's well tested.
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > Pedro.
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:06 AM
> > >> > > > > > > Steffen
> > >> Rochel
> > >> > <
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> steffenroc...@gmail.com>
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > Dear MXNet community -
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > all issues beside one
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > <
> > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/13438
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > have
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > been
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > addressed. I suggest to document the
> > >> > > > > > > last
> > >> > > > remaining
> > >> > > > > > > issue
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > as
> > >> > > > > > >     > > known
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > problem
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > and move forward with the release.
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > Please communicate if you have
> > >> > > > > > > concerns
> > of
> > >> > know
> > >> > > > > about
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > critical
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > issues
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> to
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > be
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > addressed before starting vote about
> > >> releasing
> > >> > > > 1.4.0
> > >> > > > > > as
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > soon as
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> possible.
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > Please also have a look at the
> > >> > > > > > > release
> > >> notes <
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28i
> > >> ncu
> > >> > > > > > >     > > bating%29+1.4.0+Release+Notes
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > and provide feedback.
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > I'm planing to start voting
> > >> > > > > > > beginning of
> > >> next
> > >> > > > week.
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > Steffen
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 8:31 PM
> > >> > > > > > > Steffen
> > >> Rochel
> > >> > <
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> steffenroc...@gmail.com>
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > > Hi Pedro - this are indeed the
> > >> > > > > > > draft
> > >> release
> > >> > > > notes
> > >> > > > > > for
> > >> > > > > > >     > v1.4.0.
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> Please
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > add
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > > description as you suggested.
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > > All - please have a look at the
> > >> > > > > > > release
> > >> > notes
> > >> > > > and
> > >> > > > > > > provide
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > feedback
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> and
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > > suggestions..
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > > Steffen
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > > On Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 3:30 AM
> > >> > > > > > > Zhao,
> > >> Patric
> > >> > <
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > patric.z...@intel.com>
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> Hi Steffen,
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> I saw the draft of 1.4 release
> > >> > > > > > > notes
> > in
> > >> > here
> > >> > > (
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28i
> > >> ncu
> > >> > > > > > >     > > bating%29+1.4.0+Release+Notes
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> ).
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> Is this near the final version?
> > >> > > > > > > I'd
> > >> like
> > >> > to
> > >> > > > add
> > >> > > > > > some
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > descriptions
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> of
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > new
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> quantization features enabled in
> 1.4.
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> Is it OK?
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> Thanks,
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> --Patric
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > From: Steffen Rochel [mailto:
> > >> > > > > > > steffenroc...@gmail.com]
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > Sent: Saturday, December 8,
> > >> > > > > > > 2018
> > 1:12
> > >> AM
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > To:
> dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > Subject: Apache MXNet v1.4.0
> > >> > > > > > > release
> > >> > status
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > Dear MXNet community - I would
> > >> > > > > > > like
> > to
> > >> > > > provide
> > >> > > > > > > update
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > on v1.4.0 status, details
> > >> > > > > > >     > > are
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> tracked
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> here
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > <
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> >
> > >> > > > > > >     > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+
> > >> > > %28i
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> >
> > >> > ncubating%29+1.4.0+Release+Plan+and+Status>
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > .
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > Thank you very much for
> > >> > > > > > > everybody
> > >> effort
> > >> > to
> > >> > > > > > resolve
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > the
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> identified
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> issues.
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > We are down to 3 open issues -
> > >> > > > > > > for
> > >> > details
> > >> > > > > please
> > >> > > > > > > see
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28in
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > cubating%29+1.
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > 4.0
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > +Release+Plan+and+Status#ApacheMXNet(incubating)1.4.0ReleasePla
> > >> > > +Release+Plan+and+nandS
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > +Release+Plan+and+t
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > atu
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > +Release+Plan+and+s-OpenPRstotrack
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > <
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> >
> > >> > > > > > >     > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+
> > >> > > %28i
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >     >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > ncubating%29+1.4.0+Release+Plan+and+Status#ApacheMXNet(incubating)1.
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> >
> > >> 4.0ReleasePlanandStatus-OpenPRstotrack>
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > Please help to resolve the
> > >> > > > > > > remaining
> > >> > issues
> > >> > > > and
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > integrate
> > >> > > > > > >     > > to
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> v1.4.x
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> branch.
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > Current estimate to address the
> > >> > identified
> > >> > > > > > security
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> vulnerabilities
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > in
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> the
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > Scala/Java package and merge
> > >> > > > > > > into
> > >> v1.4.x
> > >> > > > branch
> > >> > > > > > is
> > >> > > > > > > end
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > of
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > next
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> week
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > (December 14th) I will
> > >> > > > > > > communicate
> > as
> > >> > soon
> > >> > > I
> > >> > > > > have
> > >> > > > > > > more
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> information.
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > Regards,
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > Steffen
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >> >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     > >
> > >> > > > > > >     >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to