Will do. Thanks for getting it in Tao. On Mon, Jan 21, 2019, 2:14 AM Lv, Tao A <[email protected] wrote:
> Hi Steffen, thank you for the patience. #13905 passed the review and is > merged now. > > Hi Kellen, please also keep an eye on the corresponding changes on master > branch. > > -tao > > -----Original Message----- > From: kellen sunderland [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 7:34 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status > > Hey Steffen, thanks for allowing a little extra time to merge PRs. All my > PRs are in. #13905 looks good to me, but we may want someone a little more > familiar to MKLDNN / the ndarray.h file review as well. > > On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 11:53 AM Steffen Rochel <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Still waiting for merge of > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13905 > > > > All other PR are merged and CI tests are passing. Please no more > > changes on 1.4.x branch beside merge for PR 13905, so we can move > > forward with 1.4.0 release. > > > > Best Regards, > > Steffen > > > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 9:48 AM Steffen Rochel > > <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Dear MXNet community - > > > thanks for merging previously agreed PR's into v1.4.x branch. > > > > > > Kellen and Zhennan - what is the ETA for > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13905 ? Please try to > > > merge today. > > > > > > Yuxi asked offline to merge > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13922 to complete > > > Horovod integration. PR will be merged today. > > > > > > After above PR are merge and CI passed successfully 1.4.0.rc1 will > > > be created and voting started. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Steffen > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 2:34 PM kellen sunderland < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> Sounds good Steffen. I believe most of these PRs only fix > > >> functional problems (they don't add features) and should be fairly > low risk. > > >> > > >> Update from my side: > > >> 13695: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13899 <- > > >> Already merged, thanks Haibin! > > >> > > >> Ready for review / merge with all tests passed: > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13898 > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13900 > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13897 > > >> > > >> -Kellen > > >> > > >> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 10:06 PM Steffen Rochel < > > [email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > Kellen - thanks, please go ahead. I'm ok as long we avoid risky > > >> > PR and > > >> can > > >> > get to a stable and tested build by Friday. > > >> > > > >> > Best, > > >> > Steffen > > >> > > > >> > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 9:48 PM kellen sunderland < > > >> > [email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > Many thanks for the license fixes and allowing some other PRs > > >> > > to > > come > > >> > into > > >> > > the release. > > >> > > > > >> > > For #13697 I've contacted the author Zhennan and let him know > > >> > > he can > > >> cut > > >> > a > > >> > > branch to v1.4.x to update any APIs that are required. > > >> > > > > >> > > For the other PRs listed here's some new PRs for the v1.4.x > branch. > > >> > > 13188: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13898 > > >> > > 13727: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13900 > > >> > > 13695: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13899 <- > > >> Already > > >> > > merged, thanks Haibin! > > >> > > > > >> > > I'd also propose that we include this TensorRT PR which fixes > > >> inference > > >> > > bugs and updates to a more stable commit of onnx-trt: > > >> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13897 > > >> > > > > >> > > -Kellen > > >> > > > > >> > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 5:57 PM Steffen Rochel < > > >> [email protected]> > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > > Hi Lin - please go ahead to integrate into 1.4.x. > > >> > > > Steffen > > >> > > > > > >> > > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 4:17 PM Lin Yuan > > >> > > > <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Hi Steffen, > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > I would like to ask to include one more PR for 1.4.0.rc1: > > >> > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13845 > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > This PR exports exception handling API of MXNet. It is > > >> > > > > needed by > > >> > > Horovod > > >> > > > > with MXNet integration to elegantly throw exception at > > >> > > > > Python > > >> level > > >> > > > rather > > >> > > > > than a C++ abort. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Lin > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 2:24 PM Steffen Rochel < > > >> > > [email protected]> > > >> > > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Dear MXNet community - > > >> > > > > > Zach & friends made good progress resolving the licensing > > >> issues. > > >> > One > > >> > > > > more > > >> > > > > > PR on 1.4.x branch is expected today. > > >> > > > > > The code freeze for 1.4.0.rc1 is Thursday Jan 17th 6pm PST. > > >> > > > > > I'm asking the requester to add following PR to 1.4.x > branch: > > >> > > > > > Tao: > > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13882 > > >> > > > > > Kellen: > > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13697 > > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13188 > > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13727 > > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13695 > > >> > > > > > Pedro: > > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13535 > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > If there are additional PR to be considered for 1.4.0.rc1 > > please > > >> > send > > >> > > > > > request to dev@. > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Regards, > > >> > > > > > Steffen > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 11:28 AM Qing Lan > > >> > > > > > <[email protected] > > > > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Hi all, > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I added a section F in the document that explained the > > current > > >> > > > > > > static-linked dependencies we used for official > > >> > > > > > > release. As > > >> there > > >> > > > are a > > >> > > > > > few > > >> > > > > > > licenses are under BSD3 and GPL, we need to handle them > > >> > > > > > > in > > our > > >> > next > > >> > > > > > > release. Please take a look and leave any concerns you > > >> > > > > > > may > > >> have. > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Thanks, > > >> > > > > > > Qing > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On 1/7/19, 8:33 PM, "kellen sunderland" < > > >> > > > [email protected]> > > >> > > > > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > So I see two quick options that should cut down on > > >> > > > > > > the > > >> > > dependency > > >> > > > > > > licenses > > >> > > > > > > required for TRT in the source release. > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > 1: We can simply remove in the release package the > > >> submodules > > >> > > for > > >> > > > > > onnx > > >> > > > > > > in > > >> > > > > > > folder > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > incubator-mxnet/3rdparty/onnx-tensorrt/third_party/onnx/third_party. > > >> > > > > > > None of those dependencies are used in the build > > >> > > > > > > (I've > > >> just > > >> > > > > verified > > >> > > > > > > locally on my machine). > > >> > > > > > > 2: We can make a cmake based checkout system and > > >> > > > > > > ensure > > we > > >> > only > > >> > > > > > > checkout > > >> > > > > > > the required files when TRT builds are enabled > > >> > > > > > > (similar > > to > > >> > the > > >> > > > > > current > > >> > > > > > > mkl-ml setup). > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I'd suggest option 1 for this release, and that we > > support > > >> > > > option 2 > > >> > > > > > > for the > > >> > > > > > > 1.5 release. > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 8:19 PM Lv, Tao A < > > >> [email protected] > > >> > > > > >> > > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > What should I do for the double headers in > > >> > > > > > > 3rdparty/mkldnn/src/cpu/xbyak/? > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > -tao > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > >> > > > > > > > From: Steffen Rochel [mailto: > [email protected]] > > >> > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2019 10:51 AM > > >> > > > > > > > To: [email protected] > > >> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Kellen and Tao - > > >> > > > > > > > yes, the understanding is that dependencies need > > >> > > > > > > to be > > >> > > > considered > > >> > > > > > > and all > > >> > > > > > > > licences referenced to include in top level > > >> > > > > > > LICENSE > > >> file. > > >> > > > > > > > Appreciate your help with it. > > >> > > > > > > > Steffen > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 6:39 PM kellen sunderland < > > >> > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Sorry to hear about the licensing issues. I > > >> > > > > > > was > > >> > following > > >> > > > the > > >> > > > > > > general > > >> > > > > > > > > vote but I'm still lacking some clarity around > > >> > > > > > > what > > >> > > licenses > > >> > > > in > > >> > > > > > the > > >> > > > > > > > > onnx-trt repo need to be surfaced. I believe > > >> onnx-trt is > > >> > > MIT > > >> > > > > > > > > licensed, but it includes Onnx as a third party > > >> > > > > > > repo > > >> > which > > >> > > > then > > >> > > > > > > brings > > >> > > > > > > > > in dependencies with a variety of licenses. > > >> > > > > > > The > > >> proposal > > >> > > is > > >> > > > > that > > >> > > > > > > we > > >> > > > > > > > > look at these on an individual basis and then > > >> > > > > > > add > > >> them to > > >> > > our > > >> > > > > top > > >> > > > > > > level > > >> > > > > > > > LICENSE file right? > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > An alternative is that we may be able to > > >> > > > > > > checkout a > > >> > smaller > > >> > > > > > source > > >> > > > > > > > > code dependency tree if we remove a few > > >> > > > > > > unneeded > > >> ONNX's > > >> > > > > > > dependencies > > >> > > > > > > > > (pybind and google-bench). My hope is that > > >> > > > > > > this > > >> wouldn't > > >> > > > > affect > > >> > > > > > > our > > >> > > > > > > > > compilation process and would get us down to > > >> > > > > > > two > > >> licenses > > >> > > to > > >> > > > > > report > > >> > > > > > > > > (just Onnx and Onnx-TRT, both MIT). > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 6:07 PM Meghna Baijal > > >> > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> > > >> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Hi All, > > >> > > > > > > > > > For some more context, these were the last > > >> > > > > > > emails > > I > > >> > sent > > >> > > on > > >> > > > > the > > >> > > > > > > dev > > >> > > > > > > > > > and legal lists requesting help on the open > > >> questions > > >> > – > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > 1. Question on legal about the CC-By-2.5 < > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201805.m > > >> box > > >> > > > > > > > > > > /%3CCAK1xzDe6ECToKt_2cTR_7txQQCwHeYfvxXDfmuGgfA3jaTs= > > >> > > > > > > [email protected] > > >> > > > > > > > > %3E > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > 2. Question on dev about googletest file < > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mxnet-dev/201804.mbox/%3CC > > >> AMG > > >> > > > > > > > > gKDC8szdfFqQhhSNpwwT_3zi4LBS7A= > > >> > > > [email protected] > > >> > > > > > %3E > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > 3. General Request for review of the licenses > > wiki < > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mxnet-dev/201801.mbox/%3C > > >> CAM > > >> > > > > > > > > GgKDCi=s933zcVWwei15i5uBC1h88VUogt3Br=Vq28= > > >> > > > > [email protected] > > >> > > > > > %3E > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > (Note: You can click on the the “>>” next to > > >> > > > > > > the > > >> > thread > > >> > > on > > >> > > > > the > > >> > > > > > > top > > >> > > > > > > > > > right to view the next responses in the email > > >> threads > > >> > in > > >> > > > the > > >> > > > > > > apache > > >> > > > > > > > > > archive. ) > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > >> > > > > > > > > > Meghna Baijal > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 4:30 PM Steffen Rochel > > >> > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> > > >> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Dear MXNet community - > > >> > > > > > > > > > > as you should have seen in previous email, > > voting > > >> for > > >> > > > > > > v1.4.0.rc0 > > >> > > > > > > > > > > has > > >> > > > > > > > > been > > >> > > > > > > > > > > cancelled. We received a -1 vote due to > > >> outstanding > > >> > > > license > > >> > > > > > > issues. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Please help to update > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet+Source+Lice > > >> nse > > >> > > > > > > > > s > > >> > > > > > > > > > > and > > >> > > > > > > > > > > resolve outstanding issues. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > I would like to ask specifically for help > > >> > > > > > > from > > >> > > > contributors > > >> > > > > > to > > >> > > > > > > > > > > mkldnn, opemmp and onnx-tensorrt to address > > >> > > > > > > the > > >> > > feedback > > >> > > > > from > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Justin - see > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ebb8c4c00fb66dd98da13621c7dcb8 > > >> 753 > > >> > > > > > > > > fee57562a861d61379d31e9@% > > >> 3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org > > >> > %3E > > >> > > > > > > > > > > . > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > I suggest to fix the issues first on > > >> > > > > > > master, > > then > > >> > > > > cherry-pick > > >> > > > > > > and > > >> > > > > > > > > > > merge > > >> > > > > > > > > > to > > >> > > > > > > > > > > 1.4.x branch. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > I'm suggesting to exclude Julia from 1.4.0 > > >> release as > > >> > > > > > > integration > > >> > > > > > > > > > > into MXNet repo and upgrade to 0.7+ is WIP. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > I'm suggesting to exclude > > >> > > > > > > googletest/googlemock > > >> from > > >> > > > 1.4.0 > > >> > > > > > > release > > >> > > > > > > > > > > as outstanind license issues are not > > >> > > > > > > resolved > > yet. > > >> > This > > >> > > > > > should > > >> > > > > > > not > > >> > > > > > > > > > > impact users. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Please provide your feedback to the > suggestions. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Steffen > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 1:34 PM Steffen > Rochel < > > >> > > > > > > > > [email protected]> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear MXNet community - > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you have seen that voting for > > v1.4.0.rc0 > > >> has > > >> > > > > started > > >> > > > > > > and > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > will continue until December 27th noon. > > >> > > > > > > So far > > >> two > > >> > > > > binding > > >> > > > > > +1 > > >> > > > > > > > votes. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > I suggesting the following schedule to > > >> > > > > > > account > > >> for > > >> > > > > holidays > > >> > > > > > > and > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > of > > >> > > > > > > > > > course > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > depending on voting feedback. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Vote on dev@ until 12/27 > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Vote on general@ 12/28 – 1/3 > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Release announcement with pre-build > > >> > > > > > > language > > >> > bindings > > >> > > > 1/9 > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Please let me know if you have concerns > > >> > > > > > > with > > the > > >> > > > proposed > > >> > > > > > > schedule. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Steffen > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 11:22 AM Haibin Lin > < > > >> > > > > > > > > [email protected]> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> Hi Steffen, > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> Aston and I would like to bring this PR > > >> > > > > > > to > > your > > >> > > > > attention: > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13686, > > >> > > > > > > where Zhi > > >> > > > > > > > > fixed > > >> > > > > > > > > > > the > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> num_worker argument of DataLoader on > windows. > > >> > > Without > > >> > > > > this > > >> > > > > > > fix, > > >> > > > > > > > > using > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> DataLoader with num_worker > 0 would > > >> > > > > > > result > > in > > >> > crash > > >> > > > on > > >> > > > > > > Windows. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Bringing > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> this PR to 1.4.x would greatly benefit > > windows > > >> > users > > >> > > > of > > >> > > > > > > MXNet. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> Aston > > >> > > > > > > > > > is > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> working on the dive into deep learning book > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> <http://diveintodeeplearning.org> based > > >> > > > > > > on > > >> MXNet, > > >> > > > which > > >> > > > > > is > > >> > > > > > > due > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> and > > >> > > > > > > > > > > frozen > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> for publication next week. Currently the > > >> > > > > > > book > > >> will > > >> > > > > depend > > >> > > > > > on > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> MXNet > > >> > > > > > > > > > 1.4.0 > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> and discourages readers from using > > multi-worker > > >> > > > > > DataLoaders > > >> > > > > > > due > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> to > > >> > > > > > > > > > this > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> bug > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> on Windows. With this fix Aston can > > >> > > > > > > update > > the > > >> > > > examples > > >> > > > > in > > >> > > > > > > the > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> book > > >> > > > > > > > > > with > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> DataLoader using multiple workers, which > > >> > > > > > > will > > >> be > > >> > > very > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> beneficial to > > >> > > > > > > > > > the > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> broader MXNet community. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> Best, > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> Haibin > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 6:11 AM Pedro > > >> > > > > > > Larroy > > < > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> [email protected]> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > Hi Steffen > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > Added some notes in your PR for the > > >> > > > > > > release > > >> > notes. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > In particular, I'm a bit concerned > > >> > > > > > > about > > the > > >> > > status > > >> > > > of > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > topology > > >> > > > > > > > > > aware > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > communication, since it has open > > >> > > > > > > issues and > > >> is > > >> > not > > >> > > > > being > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > tested in > > >> > > > > > > > > > CI. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > (The tests also fail). I think we > > >> > > > > > > should > > >> anounce > > >> > > it > > >> > > > > when > > >> > > > > > > it's > > >> > > > > > > > > > working > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > properly and it's well tested. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > Pedro. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:06 AM > > >> > > > > > > Steffen > > >> Rochel > > >> > < > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> [email protected]> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Dear MXNet community - > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > all issues beside one > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > < > > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/13438 > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > have > > >> > > > > > > > > > been > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > addressed. I suggest to document the > > >> > > > > > > last > > >> > > > remaining > > >> > > > > > > issue > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > as > > >> > > > > > > > > known > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > problem > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > and move forward with the release. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Please communicate if you have > > >> > > > > > > concerns > > of > > >> > know > > >> > > > > about > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > critical > > >> > > > > > > > > > > issues > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> to > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > be > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > addressed before starting vote about > > >> releasing > > >> > > > 1.4.0 > > >> > > > > > as > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > soon as > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> possible. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Please also have a look at the > > >> > > > > > > release > > >> notes < > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28i > > >> ncu > > >> > > > > > > > > bating%29+1.4.0+Release+Notes > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > and provide feedback. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > I'm planing to start voting > > >> > > > > > > beginning of > > >> next > > >> > > > week. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Steffen > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 8:31 PM > > >> > > > > > > Steffen > > >> Rochel > > >> > < > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> [email protected]> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Hi Pedro - this are indeed the > > >> > > > > > > draft > > >> release > > >> > > > notes > > >> > > > > > for > > >> > > > > > > > v1.4.0. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> Please > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > add > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > description as you suggested. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > All - please have a look at the > > >> > > > > > > release > > >> > notes > > >> > > > and > > >> > > > > > > provide > > >> > > > > > > > > > feedback > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> and > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > suggestions.. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Steffen > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > On Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 3:30 AM > > >> > > > > > > Zhao, > > >> Patric > > >> > < > > >> > > > > > > > > > > [email protected]> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> Hi Steffen, > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> I saw the draft of 1.4 release > > >> > > > > > > notes > > in > > >> > here > > >> > > ( > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28i > > >> ncu > > >> > > > > > > > > bating%29+1.4.0+Release+Notes > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> ). > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> Is this near the final version? > > >> > > > > > > I'd > > >> like > > >> > to > > >> > > > add > > >> > > > > > some > > >> > > > > > > > > > > descriptions > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> of > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > new > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> quantization features enabled in > 1.4. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> Is it OK? > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> --Patric > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > -----Original Message----- > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > From: Steffen Rochel [mailto: > > >> > > > > > > [email protected]] > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > Sent: Saturday, December 8, > > >> > > > > > > 2018 > > 1:12 > > >> AM > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > To: > [email protected] > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > Subject: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 > > >> > > > > > > release > > >> > status > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > Dear MXNet community - I would > > >> > > > > > > like > > to > > >> > > > provide > > >> > > > > > > update > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > on v1.4.0 status, details > > >> > > > > > > > > are > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> tracked > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> here > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > < > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+ > > >> > > %28i > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > ncubating%29+1.4.0+Release+Plan+and+Status> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > . > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > Thank you very much for > > >> > > > > > > everybody > > >> effort > > >> > to > > >> > > > > > resolve > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > the > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> identified > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> issues. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > We are down to 3 open issues - > > >> > > > > > > for > > >> > details > > >> > > > > please > > >> > > > > > > see > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28in > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > cubating%29+1. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > 4.0 > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > +Release+Plan+and+Status#ApacheMXNet(incubating)1.4.0ReleasePla > > >> > > +Release+Plan+and+nandS > > >> > > > > > > > > > +Release+Plan+and+t > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > atu > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > +Release+Plan+and+s-OpenPRstotrack > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > < > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+ > > >> > > %28i > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > ncubating%29+1.4.0+Release+Plan+and+Status#ApacheMXNet(incubating)1. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > >> 4.0ReleasePlanandStatus-OpenPRstotrack> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > Please help to resolve the > > >> > > > > > > remaining > > >> > issues > > >> > > > and > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > integrate > > >> > > > > > > > > to > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> v1.4.x > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> branch. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > Current estimate to address the > > >> > identified > > >> > > > > > security > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> vulnerabilities > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > in > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> the > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > Scala/Java package and merge > > >> > > > > > > into > > >> v1.4.x > > >> > > > branch > > >> > > > > > is > > >> > > > > > > end > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > of > > >> > > > > > > > > > next > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> week > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > (December 14th) I will > > >> > > > > > > communicate > > as > > >> > soon > > >> > > I > > >> > > > > have > > >> > > > > > > more > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> information. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > Regards, > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > Steffen > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >
