Hi Aaron,
Thanks for your valuable feedback.
I'll prepare to contribute this change and PR soon, and update the contents as
suggested.
Regarding making "Performance" a Key Feature to replace with "Tools &
Libraries", anything I need to take care when removing "Tools & Libraries" part?
Thanks!
-Ciyong
-----Original Message-----
From: Aaron Markham <aaron.s.mark...@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2019 4:14 AM
To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Proposal for MXNet website improving
Hi Ciyong, thanks for the proposal.
I like your suggestions. Will you be submitting a PR?
Some feedback:
* Regarding changing the URLs, let's avoid that. We just had a lot of work
trying to fix broken links.
* As far as changing the headings, sure, Tutorials and FAQs makes sense.
* Adding performance as a nav item - my preference and going from UX
guidelines, is to keep the number of them down to less than five or six.
- What about making performance a Key Feature and highlighting that on the
main page? I'd switch it with Tools & Libraries since Ecosystem is the next
thing below.
Cheers,
Aaron
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 2:03 AM Chen, Ciyong <ciyong.c...@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Hi MXNet community,
>
> While doing search for MXNet from the official
> website[https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/], it's not that convenient to get
> the recent/latest performance data, besides there's some mismatch between the
> link and description in the current websites.
> We can also add some new contents (like distributed training via Horovod, and
> AMP with bfloat16 data type) descriptions in FAQ section.
>
> So I propose to improve the current website structure from below 3
> areas
>
> 1. Add a new Tab "Performance" in the header, and change
> "Doc&Tutorials" to "Tutorials&FAQ" according to the current contents.
>
> 2. Align description of FAQ section to the inner page.
>
> 3. FAQ list adjustment
>
> Please check the details via below link
> https://drive.google.com/open?id=1gQrC1V1LeJH5NT6zRqBl8Ub2qSr1dc8O
>
> Suggestions and comments are highly appreciated.
>
> Thanks!
> -Ciyong
>
