From my view, performance is a big plus for MXNet and the reason why lots of people adopted in MXNet.
I still think we need to have a top-level class for "performance". Thanks, --Patric > -----Original Message----- > From: Chen, Ciyong <ciyong.c...@intel.com> > Sent: Monday, December 23, 2019 12:08 PM > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: Proposal for MXNet website improving > > Hi Aaron, > > Thanks for your valuable feedback. > I'll prepare to contribute this change and PR soon, and update the contents > as suggested. > > Regarding making "Performance" a Key Feature to replace with "Tools & > Libraries", anything I need to take care when removing "Tools & Libraries" > part? > > Thanks! > -Ciyong > > -----Original Message----- > From: Aaron Markham <aaron.s.mark...@gmail.com> > Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2019 4:14 AM > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Proposal for MXNet website improving > > Hi Ciyong, thanks for the proposal. > I like your suggestions. Will you be submitting a PR? > > Some feedback: > > * Regarding changing the URLs, let's avoid that. We just had a lot of work > trying to fix broken links. > * As far as changing the headings, sure, Tutorials and FAQs makes sense. > * Adding performance as a nav item - my preference and going from UX > guidelines, is to keep the number of them down to less than five or six. > - What about making performance a Key Feature and highlighting that on > the main page? I'd switch it with Tools & Libraries since Ecosystem is the > next > thing below. > > Cheers, > Aaron > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 2:03 AM Chen, Ciyong <ciyong.c...@intel.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi MXNet community, > > > > While doing search for MXNet from the official > website[https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/], it's not that convenient to > get the recent/latest performance data, besides there's some mismatch > between the link and description in the current websites. > > We can also add some new contents (like distributed training via Horovod, > and AMP with bfloat16 data type) descriptions in FAQ section. > > > > So I propose to improve the current website structure from below 3 > > areas > > > > 1. Add a new Tab "Performance" in the header, and change > "Doc&Tutorials" to "Tutorials&FAQ" according to the current contents. > > > > 2. Align description of FAQ section to the inner page. > > > > 3. FAQ list adjustment > > > > Please check the details via below link > > > https://drive.google.com/open?id=1gQrC1V1LeJH5NT6zRqBl8Ub2qSr1dc8O > > > > Suggestions and comments are highly appreciated. > > > > Thanks! > > -Ciyong > >
