+1

I tested below items:
1. download artifacts from Apache dist repo;
2. the signature looks good;
3. build from source code with MKL-DNN and MKL on centos;
4. run fp32 and int8 inference of ResNet50 under /example/quantization/.

thanks,
-tao

On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 11:00 AM Tao Lv <ta...@apache.org> wrote:

> I see. I was looking at this page:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.6.0.rc2
>
> On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 4:54 AM Przemysław Trędak <ptre...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Tao,
>>
>> Could you tell me where did you look for it and did not find it? I just
>> checked and both
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.6.0.rc2/ and
>> draft of the release on GitHub have them.
>>
>> Thank you
>> Przemek
>>
>> On 2020/02/01 14:23:11, Tao Lv <ta...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > It seems the src tar and signature are missing from the tag.
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 11:09 AM Przemysław Trędak <ptre...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Dear MXNet community,
>> > >
>> > > This is the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0.
>> > > Voting starts today and will close on Monday 2/3/2020 23:59 PST.
>> > >
>> > > Link to release notes:
>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.6.0+Release+notes
>> > >
>> > > Link to release candidate:
>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.6.0.rc2
>> > >
>> > > Link to source and signatures on apache dist server:
>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.6.0.rc2/
>> > >
>> > > The differences comparing to previous release candidate 1.6.0.rc1:
>> > >  * Fixes for license issues (#17361, #17375, #17370, #17460)
>> > >  * Bugfix for saving LSTM layer parameter (#17288)
>> > >  * Bugfix for downloading the model from model zoo from multiple
>> processes
>> > > (#17372)
>> > >  * Fixed a symbol.py in AMP for GluonNLP (#17408)
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Please remember to TEST first before voting accordingly:
>> > > +1 = approve
>> > > +0 = no opinion
>> > > -1 = disapprove (provide reason)
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Best regards,
>> > > Przemyslaw Tredak
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to