Hi Pedro,

>From the issue that you linked it seems that you are using the LLVM OpenMP, 
>whereas I believe the actual release uses libgomp (at least that's what seems 
>to be the conclusion from this issue: 
>https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/16891)?

Przemek

On 2020/02/04 03:42:30, Pedro Larroy <pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> -1
> 
> Unit tests passed in CPU build.
> 
> I observe crashes related to openmp using cpp unit tests:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/17043
> 
> Pedro.
> 
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 6:44 PM Chaitanya Bapat <chai.ba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > +1
> > Successfully built MXNet 1.6.0rc2 on Linux
> > Tested for OpPerf utility
> > For CPU -
> > https://gist.github.com/ChaiBapchya/d5ecc3e971c5a3c558d672477b4b6b9c
> >
> > Works well!
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 at 15:43, Lin Yuan <apefor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Tested Horovod with mnist example. My compiler flags are below:
> > >
> > > [✔ CUDA, ✔ CUDNN, ✔ NCCL, ✔ CUDA_RTC, ✖ TENSORRT, ✔ CPU_SSE, ✔ CPU_SSE2,
> > ✔
> > > CPU_SSE3, ✔ CPU_SSE4_1, ✔ CPU_SSE4_2, ✖ CPU_SSE4A, ✔ CPU_AVX, ✖
> > CPU_AVX2, ✔
> > > OPENMP, ✖ SSE, ✔ F16C, ✖ JEMALLOC, ✔ BLAS_OPEN, ✖ BLAS_ATLAS, ✖
> > BLAS_MKL, ✖
> > > BLAS_APPLE, ✔ LAPACK, ✖ MKLDNN, ✔ OPENCV, ✖ CAFFE, ✖ PROFILER, ✔
> > > DIST_KVSTORE, ✖ CXX14, ✖ INT64_TENSOR_SIZE, ✖ SIGNAL_HANDLER, ✖ DEBUG, ✖
> > > TVM_OP]
> > >
> > > Lin
> > >
> > > On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 9:55 PM Tao Lv <ta...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > I tested below items:
> > > > 1. download artifacts from Apache dist repo;
> > > > 2. the signature looks good;
> > > > 3. build from source code with MKL-DNN and MKL on centos;
> > > > 4. run fp32 and int8 inference of ResNet50 under
> > /example/quantization/.
> > > >
> > > > thanks,
> > > > -tao
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 11:00 AM Tao Lv <ta...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I see. I was looking at this page:
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.6.0.rc2
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 4:54 AM Przemysław Trędak <ptre...@apache.org
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hi Tao,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Could you tell me where did you look for it and did not find it? I
> > > just
> > > > >> checked and both
> > > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.6.0.rc2/
> > and
> > > > >> draft of the release on GitHub have them.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thank you
> > > > >> Przemek
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On 2020/02/01 14:23:11, Tao Lv <ta...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >> > It seems the src tar and signature are missing from the tag.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 11:09 AM Przemysław Trędak <
> > > > ptre...@apache.org>
> > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > Dear MXNet community,
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > This is the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version
> > > 1.6.0.
> > > > >> > > Voting starts today and will close on Monday 2/3/2020 23:59 PST.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Link to release notes:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.6.0+Release+notes
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Link to release candidate:
> > > > >> > >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.6.0.rc2
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Link to source and signatures on apache dist server:
> > > > >> > >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.6.0.rc2/
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > The differences comparing to previous release candidate
> > 1.6.0.rc1:
> > > > >> > >  * Fixes for license issues (#17361, #17375, #17370, #17460)
> > > > >> > >  * Bugfix for saving LSTM layer parameter (#17288)
> > > > >> > >  * Bugfix for downloading the model from model zoo from multiple
> > > > >> processes
> > > > >> > > (#17372)
> > > > >> > >  * Fixed a symbol.py in AMP for GluonNLP (#17408)
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Please remember to TEST first before voting accordingly:
> > > > >> > > +1 = approve
> > > > >> > > +0 = no opinion
> > > > >> > > -1 = disapprove (provide reason)
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Best regards,
> > > > >> > > Przemyslaw Tredak
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Chaitanya Prakash Bapat*
> > *+1 (973) 953-6299*
> >
> > [image: https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapat25]
> > <https://github.com/ChaiBapchya>[image: https://www.facebook.com/chaibapat
> > ]
> > <https://www.facebook.com/chaibapchya>[image:
> > https://twitter.com/ChaiBapchya] <https://twitter.com/ChaiBapchya>[image:
> > https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapat25]
> > <https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapchya/>
> >
> 

Reply via email to