On 4/14/05, Stan Silvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <rant> > It seems to me that all this will be very confusing for users whether we > call this "Beta" or "non-final". We might as well call it "horse poop", > because nobody will want to use it in a real app. > > It IS MyFaces 1.0.9. It should only be called "Beta" if it is not ready > for prime time. > > I know that before the JBoss Application Server passed the TCK we didn't > go around calling our product "Beta". > </rant>
And that was the subject of considerable discussions :-). > > Can we get a clarification from Sun as to what the requirements are? > I'm sure they will be reasonable about it. See the spec license at the front of the JSF specification, available at: http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=127 In particular, the second paragraph under "NOTICE: LIMITED LICENSE GRANTS". Everyone has always wanted MyFaces to pass the TCK and be certified -- it's just time to get with the program. > > Stan Silvert > JBoss, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > callto://stansilvert Craig McClanahan Sun Microsystems, Inc. (Was co-spec-lead for JSF 1.0)
