Manfred, I too seem to recall that forrest has a clean command but I don't think that will help with the javadoc and tlddoc (unless there are comparable commands for those.)
Bruno, The delete command would be fine but we don't know in advance which files are to be deleted. Ex. We remove a class file and so we no longer want the corresponding HTML file in the javadoc. Are you saying that deleting the files with svn delete and then regenerating them will only result in an svn delete for the files that were not replaced? sean On 5/13/05, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think you should first mark the files as 'deleted' with the svn delete > command, then, these files will be deleted automatically on commit... > > Bruno > > 2005/5/13, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > If I remember right, there is already a forrest "clean" target that > > empties the site build dir. > > -Manfred > > > > 2005/5/13, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >: > > > I double-checked and realized that Forrest was *not* deleting the > > > defunct files. So next I will try having ant remove all of the > > > website files (*.html, etc.) and then generate them all over again. > > > I'll then see if the defunct files are automatically removed on the > > > commit. Regular commit is working fine so I have high hopes :-) > > > > > > sean > > > > > > On 5/12/05, Martin Cooper < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 12 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote: > > > > > > > > > Martin, > > > > > > > > > > Never mind. I got it working so I don't need the distro. One quick > > > > > question though. Have you ever used ant and svn to "delete" files > > > > > that were already checked in. We're rebuilding our website and so > > > > > files need to be removed if the javadoc changes etc. > > > > > > > > No, I haven't tried delete. I've only used checkout and update. It > should > > > > "just work", though. ;-) > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Martin Cooper > > > > > > > > > sean > > > > > > > > > > On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >>> Are you using javahl as well? I couldn't get a binary version of > the > > > > >>> jar and the build file from the source had several issues > (including > > > > >>> lacking a jar command.) I moved to jsvn after reading something > on > > > > >>> the subversion site about jsvn being the most complete java svn > > > > >>> implementation. > > > > >> > > > > >> The distro I picked up has a svnjavahl.dll in it, yes. I don't > recall > > > > >> where I got the binaries from, but I picked up "svnant 0.9.13.zip" > from > > > > >> somewhere. I can send it to you off-list if you want. > > > > >> > > > > >> -- > > > > >> Martin Cooper > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >>> I think I have it working now but I'm doing a few more tests. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> sean > > > > >>> > > > > >>> On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> OK. I have SVN working at my office now. Next step is to check > into > > > > >>>>> SVN and Ant. Anyone have any experience with using SVN with > Ant? > > > > >>>>> Looks like I need to hunt around for a custom task since its not > part > > > > >>>>> of the core or optional tasks. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> I use SvnAnt, which works just fine. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> -- > > > > >>>> Martin Cooper > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> sean > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >>>>>> First I will try to get SVN working for nightly build. The > infra > > > > >>>>>> people at my work have still not figured out how to open the > firewall > > > > >>>>>> for SVN (Grrrrr.) I need to get that resolved ASAP. Then I > will fix > > > > >>>>>> the build script. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> I haven't had a chance to look at Manfred's website build > procedure. > > > > >>>>>> I will investigate that next and look into automating that plus > the > > > > >>>>>> javadoc. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> sean > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> On 5/3/05, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>> ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to build-site.xml > > > > >>>>>>> so, on site creation those dirs are updated automatically. > > > > >>>>>>> did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not been > synced yet. > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> -Manfred > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > >>>>>>>> tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. Will try > to upload > > > > >>>>>>>> them again ASAP. > > > > >>>>>>>> I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the website dir > last > > > > >>>>>>>> time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add tldoc > and javadoc > > > > >>>>>>>> to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again in the > future. > > > > >>>>>>>> Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and upload to > the nightly build? > > > > >>>>>>>> The following steps would be great: > > > > >>>>>>>> * automatically build docs in ${ project.dir}/../site > > > > >>>>>>>> * SVN commit it automatically > > > > >>>>>>>> * sftp it to minotaur > > > > >>>>>>>> -Manfred > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Grant Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> We probably now need to urgently update the nightly build > script to send > > > > >>>>>>>>> everything to Subversion instead of CVS. > > > > >>>>>>>>> Sean ? :) > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
