Actually I forgot to mention my idea for sandbox.  I think we should
have a separate jar file for the sandbox (myfaces-sandbox.jar)  It
would have the necessary share code + sandbox specifcic TLD  + its own
javadoc.

My thinking is that we have a sandbox bundle but that we never
formally release it (since its just a sandbox.)  So you can build from
source or get a nightly sandbox-05272005.tar.gz.

So us MyFaces developers who use MyFaces implementation (instead of
RI) would have two jar files in our path: myfaces-all.jar and
myfaces-sandbox.jar

What do you think?

sean

On 5/27/05, Sylvain Vieujot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  +1 on myfaces-all.jar too.
>  
>  Maybe it should include the future sandbox's files too.
>  So maybe a myfaces.jar, same as we have today, and a myfaces-all.jar that
> will also includes the sandbox files.
>  
>  Sylvain.
> 
>  
>  
>  On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 11:32 +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: 
>  +1 on myfaces-all.jar
> ;)
> 
> On 5/27/05, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I agree with Martin that the jar with all the stuff is very useful, at
> least
> > for me that I update the jar very often. With only one jar I can discard
> > that I have done a mistake deploying the jars when an exception or error
> is
> > thrown. My 2 euro cents...
> > 
> > Bruno
> > 
> > 2005/5/27, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > I would still supply a catch-it-all you get it all jar file.
> > > 
> > > It's just so much easier, and there are many frameworks supplying
> > > something like that.
> > > 
> > > To avoid confusion, we should name it:
> > > 
> > > myfaces-all.jar 
> > > 
> > > though, I think!
> > > 
> > > regards,
> > > 
> > > Martin
> > > 
> > > On 5/27/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Can someone please elaborate on what the "shared" code contains and 
> > > > > why it is in "quotes"? :-)
> > > >
> > > > This refers to the code currently in the trunk under src/share. It
> > > > refers to code that is used in both the implentation as well as the
> > > > custom components. 
> > > >
> > > > > John Fallows.
> > > >
> > > > sean
> > > >
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
>

Reply via email to