2005/5/30, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > -0.5 on bundling sandbox with myfaces-all > > I like the idea of a separated sandbox jar more. A separate jar gives > > the sandbox more sense IMO and also makes no difference between > > Myfaces-Impl or RI users. > > I agree but there are others who feel differently. Do they want to > make the case again for one all inclusive jar file (including > sandbox)?
Now, after a short talk to Martin things are clearer to me. In fact the sandbox release question actually consists of two different issues: 1. Should we release a myfaces-sandbox.jar ? 2. Shall the sandbox classes be included in myfaces-all.jar ? Here are my revised votes +1 for releasing a separate myfaces-sandbox.jar +0 for including sandbox classes in myfaces-all.jar -Manfred
