+1 for a separate myfaces-sandbox.jar
On 5/30/05, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2005/5/30, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > -0.5 on bundling sandbox with myfaces-all > > > I like the idea of a separated sandbox jar more. A separate jar gives > > > the sandbox more sense IMO and also makes no difference between > > > Myfaces-Impl or RI users. > > > > I agree but there are others who feel differently. Do they want to > > make the case again for one all inclusive jar file (including > > sandbox)? > > Now, after a short talk to Martin things are clearer to me. > In fact the sandbox release question actually consists of two different > issues: > 1. Should we release a myfaces-sandbox.jar ? > 2. Shall the sandbox classes be included in myfaces-all.jar ? > > Here are my revised votes > > +1 for releasing a separate myfaces-sandbox.jar > +0 for including sandbox classes in myfaces-all.jar > > -Manfred > -- Matthias Wessendorf
