> One of the Oracle guys suggested tomahawk. I like it because it has > an Apache ring to it. I'm open to other code names (although lets > call it tomahawk now as you are doing for the purposes of discussion > the jar file contents.) Also I think a codename is better than > myfaces-components. For starters its not just components. Also, > people seem to be confused about whether it works only with myfaces.
Code names tend to become official project names very often ;-) So, I think we should solve the name issue soon. Besides the Tomahawk Cruise Missile http://www.chinfo.navy.mil/navpalib/factfile/missiles/wep-toma.html (that's the martial connotation I do not like too) another "popular" product with that name exists: http://www.dodge.com/tomahawk/ (No problem with that, of course! ;-) What about registered trademarks? Are we allowed to call our subproject "Tomahawk" at all? -Manfred
