Hadn't thought about that part ... that might cause a lot of headaches, especially with users who don't realize its changed. I'm changing my vote to 0 for Matthias' idea but still +1 for changing the name as Bruno suggested.
On 8/3/05, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > another (reluctant) +1 > > cause all users have to change their JSP-files with that, just changing the > prefix doesn't do any harm. > > regards, > > Martin > > > On 8/3/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1 for Matthias' suggestion as well > > > > On 8/3/05, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > +1 to the 'also' :-) I think we should change to tomahawk wherever it > > > is needed... > > > > > > Bruno > > > > > > 2005/8/3, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > also > > > > > > > > <uri> http://myfaces.apache.org/extensions</uri> > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 8/3/05, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > On 8/2/05, Sean Schofield < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I was thinking that also. +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > On 8/2/05, Bruno Aranda < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Now that we are adjusting names to tomahawk, should'nt also the > > > > > > > myfaces_ext.tld file change to tomahawk.tld? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bruno > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > > > >
