I suspect that it might be the license issue - you remember, we discussed that?
regards,
Martin
On 8/9/05, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FYI
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jacob Hookom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Aug 9, 2005 3:07 PM
Subject: Shale Tapestry Integration
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Gary,
I'm wondering why Shale doesn't just look at using Facelets instead of
trying to integrate a parser from a completely different framework? It
is already JSF-centric with more templating features than Tapestry. On
top of that, Facelets uses the new EL API to properly handle EL variable
management-- better than the next version of JSP (2.1) for tree creation.
Home Page:
https://facelets.dev.java.net/
Documentation:
https://facelets.dev.java.net/nonav/docs/dev/docbook.html
Sample Error Page:
https://facelets.dev.java.net/nonav/docs/dev/error.html
Cheers,
Jacob
--
Matthias Wessendorf
