I'll put in my 2cents. Let's see if we can get the machine to work with those ;)
currently, we treat myfaces as a project with an integrated release-cycle. We don't release things separately here so far. (except tobago). So I'd say we should go with this for now - I'd say that the Maven-POMs are easily enough changed. I really like how they decreased the ant-clutter. regards, Martin On 1/5/06, Bernd Bohmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Sean, > > I think we should talk about the release cycle of each artifact, first. > If artifacts have the same release cycle and version, the artifact > should belongs to the same svn module. And should organised as > multimodule build with parent-child poms, of cause. The assembly > descriptor should be a part of this svn module. Because we should be > able to reproduce a version from svn. (and creating a branch whould be > easy, too) (look at the thread 'problem getting 1.1.1 from svn') > > The examples for tomahawk, sandbox.. should be a part of the projects > and not independ. (The same reason as assembly) > > > I added a 'publish' project which has a POM that deals exclusively > > with the assembly stuff. Eventually it will also publish the nightly > > builds to the website and publish the website as well. > > > > Who invokes the nightly build? > > > I added javadoc for all subprojects (its in the top level POM.) We > > want it for every subproject except the examples. Is there a way to > > exclude this for just examples? > > > Also, if we remove the parent > > reference in a project like tomahawk, can we still inherit from the > > parent when the tomahawk POM is called from the parent POM? > > I think this is not possible, the opposite yes. > > > Proposal: We eliminate the refs to the parent POM. I don't see a > > reason to have them really. > > Why you don't like it? (after 4 days) > > I think users should be able to build > > each of the subprojects independently. > > If we have a SNAPSHOT repository this should not be a problem. > > Maybe we could also get rid of > > the reports from each individual project POM since site generation is > > only really necessary for the entire project. > > Maybe some reports are useful. > > > > > What do you think? > > > > Sean > > > > Maybe the site should be a own module and of cause with a parent ref. > > Bernd > > -- > Dipl.-Ing. Bernd Bohmann - Atanion GmbH - Software Development > Bismarckstr. 13, 26122 Oldenburg, http://www.atanion.com > phone: +49 441 4082312, mobile: +49 173 8839471, fax: +49 441 4082333 > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
