Why do you think others are ignoring it? ;-) I, for myself, prefer small downloads with a explicit list of dependencies. Also for the examples...
regards Alexander PS: It would be interesting to dive into maven... but I have some other loose ends to fix... -----Original Message----- From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 10:42 PM To: MyFaces Development Subject: Re: [maven] Need help with the nightly builds Why don't you start a "Proposal: Include dependencies in release" thread? You can see what other people think. I think most people ignore these maven threads besides the two of us ;-) For now we have it the way it was before maven which is good. Thanks. Sean On 1/19/06, Bernd Bohmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think you are wrong, but i checked in a working bin assembly. > > > > I disagree. We don't want to distribute the jakarta-commons jars, > > etc. I agree that its ok for the examples (they go in the WAR) b/c it > > makes testing the examples easier. > > > > Can the transitive dependency part be turned off? Is that an option > > with assembly? If so, please turn it off. That's the way our nightly > > builds (and releases) have been up until now. > > > > > >>>2.) Maven assembly doesn't really allow you to easily create both > >>>source and bin tarballs. > >> > >>What should contain the source tarball? > > > > > > Take a look at the last (1.1.1) release. There is a source tarball there. > > > > Sean > > > > -- > Dipl.-Ing. Bernd Bohmann - Atanion GmbH - Software Development > Bismarckstr. 13, 26122 Oldenburg, http://www.atanion.com > phone: +49 441 4082312, mobile: +49 173 8839471, fax: +49 441 4082333 >
