Ok, sounds sensible. Let's wait for the next release then, so we have the time to test all this thoroughtly,
Regards, Bruno On 2/11/06, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Bruno, as we talked things over already over gtalk. > > I think we should wait a few more weeks, and should > make a push for MyFaces 1.1.3. > > The reason, there is a foundation there, but we do not have any real > components yet (which I would love to showcase) > > (except for the one development component > which can trigger the dojo system) > > If the others have no objection I would rather have those interfaces > stabilized while we work on 1-2 actual components > (Bruno does currently, so do I and also Laurie Harper who contacted me a > while ago) so that we see if this foundation > can hold in actual usage. > > As for the interfaces please use them and do not try to trigger Dojo > directly. The main reason for this is, that some big companies as it > seems move towards dojo as well, so we might have do do an adjustment of > how to initialize all that stuff in future releases (maybe weblets or > something else) to avoide double imports currently I only root into our > own resource loader and let dojo handle the rest. > > If you need an extension please extend those interfaces and do not hack > your own stuff. > > So -1 for pushing it into tomahawk yet, simply due to the fact that I > want to have everything seen in a real useage and want to know if I have > to do some adjustments on the foundation I laid. > But feel free to hack away in the sandbox, and we will opt a move > towards tomahawk for 1.1.3. > > Werner > > > > Bruno Aranda schrieb: > > Hi devs, > > > > I want to promote the dojo stuff from sandbox to tomahawk as I need > > this on a project I am working on. Do we have to vote on this? As it > > is not a component strictly speaking... BTW, Werner, do you think that > > the dojo code is stable enough to move it to tomahawk? > > > > Regards, > > > > Bruno > > > >
