On 2/11/06, Martin Marinschek <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 on blogging on myfaces and dojo ;)
regards,
Martin
On 2/11/06, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Btw. just to add something to this discussion, Alex Russel the core
> maintainer of Dojo asked me for permission to blog that we now use Dojo
> in Myfaces.
> If no one objects I would like to give him the permission
> so that he can spread the news a little bit ;-)
> As it is very likely that we wont pull the plug on Dojo.
>
>
> Werner
>
>
>
> Bruno Aranda schrieb:
> > Ok, sounds sensible. Let's wait for the next release then, so we have
> > the time to test all this thoroughtly,
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Bruno
> >
> > On 2/11/06, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hi Bruno, as we talked things over already over gtalk.
> >>
> >> I think we should wait a few more weeks, and should
> >> make a push for MyFaces 1.1.3.
> >>
> >> The reason, there is a foundation there, but we do not have any real
> >> components yet (which I would love to showcase)
> >>
> >> (except for the one development component
> >> which can trigger the dojo system)
> >>
> >> If the others have no objection I would rather have those interfaces
> >> stabilized while we work on 1-2 actual components
> >> (Bruno does currently, so do I and also Laurie Harper who contacted me a
> >> while ago) so that we see if this foundation
> >> can hold in actual usage.
> >>
> >> As for the interfaces please use them and do not try to trigger Dojo
> >> directly. The main reason for this is, that some big companies as it
> >> seems move towards dojo as well, so we might have do do an adjustment of
> >> how to initialize all that stuff in future releases (maybe weblets or
> >> something else) to avoide double imports currently I only root into our
> >> own resource loader and let dojo handle the rest.
> >>
> >> If you need an extension please extend those interfaces and do not hack
> >> your own stuff.
> >>
> >> So -1 for pushing it into tomahawk yet, simply due to the fact that I
> >> want to have everything seen in a real useage and want to know if I have
> >> to do some adjustments on the foundation I laid.
> >> But feel free to hack away in the sandbox, and we will opt a move
> >> towards tomahawk for 1.1.3.
> >>
> >> Werner
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Bruno Aranda schrieb:
> >>> Hi devs,
> >>>
> >>> I want to promote the dojo stuff from sandbox to tomahawk as I need
> >>> this on a project I am working on. Do we have to vote on this? As it
> >>> is not a component strictly speaking... BTW, Werner, do you think that
> >>> the dojo code is stable enough to move it to tomahawk?
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>> Bruno
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
--
Grant Smith
