That would be fine. After I am done we may need some help from Sean. He was talking about putting Tomcat 6 jars in an Apache Maven repository.
I've been building with NetBeans and not Maven. So someone who is more Maven savvy will need to update things so it builds correctly. I don't think it will be more complicated than adding and removing some dependencies. Stan Silvert JBoss, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] callto://stansilvert > -----Original Message----- > From: Manfred Geiler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 8:48 PM > To: MyFaces Development > Subject: Re: JSF 1.2 [was: Cancelled: JavaOne MyFaces > Committers/Contributors meeting] > > Sean, > Can you please make a copy of the current trunk to > /myfaces/core/branches/jsf_1_2 ? > After that, Stan can simply (?) merge his stuff inside that. > Is that ok, Stan? > > Manfred > > > On 5/18/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You want a 1.2 branch for core only using the latest trunk right? I > > can create it for you if you want ... > > > > Sean > > > > On 5/18/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Manfred, can you go ahead with that 1.2 branch? > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > Martin > > > > > > On 5/18/06, Thomas Spiegl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'm having a look at tomahawk 416 > > > > > > > > +1 for creating a 1.2 branch > > > > > > > > On 5/18/06, Stan Silvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I have implemented most of the new core API's and fixed most of > the > > > > > deprecated ones to be backwards compatible with 1.1 (if you look > at the > > > > > 1.2 javadocs you'll see what I mean). If you look at the section > in the > > > > > spec preface entitled "What's Changed Since the Last Release" you > can > > > > > get a feel for what I did. I've pretty much done everything in > that > > > > > list. > > > > > > > > > > Most of it is covered under this issue, which just says to > implement > > > > > several sections of the spec: > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1274 > > > > > > > > > > I believe all of 1274 is complete except > > > > > ApplicationImpl.getResourceBundle(). I needed code that reads the > new > > > > > faces-context.xml for that one. However, all the ELResolver stuff > is > > > > > done including the ResourceBundleELResolver. > > > > > > > > > > I've also done some of the issues listed under General Changes. > For > > > > > each item in that list, I created a Jira task. You can look at > Jira and > > > > > see which ones I did. > > > > > > > > > > I was just getting started on the javax.faces.webapp package when > I was > > > > > taken off of the project. I probably won't commit any changes > from > > > > > that. I didn't touch the components or renderer at all. With all > the > > > > > backward-compatible code I wrote, it appears that all the > components > > > > > still work even though they are written the "1.1 way". > > > > > > > > > > So, hopefully, what you guys will have to start with is a JSF 1.2 > impl > > > > > that is about half-way done and still works. > > > > > > > > > > Stan Silvert > > > > > JBoss, Inc. > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > callto://stansilvert > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Thomas Spiegl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:58 PM > > > > > > To: MyFaces Development; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Subject: Re: JSF 1.2 [was: Cancelled: JavaOne MyFaces > > > > > > Committers/Contributors meeting] > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 for solving tomahawk 416, being incompatible to RI is a > serious > > > > > issue > > > > > > > > > > > > Stan which 1.2 issues did you fix. Did you change any link > renderers? > > > > > > If not, i am > > > > > > +1 for open a 1.2 branch > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/17/06, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Sean Schofield schrieb: > > > > > > > > I'm -1 on the 1.2 branch. There are major issues to be > fixed in > > > > > the > > > > > > > > core right now. (See TOMAHAWK-416 and related dev > discussions.) > > > > > I > > > > > > > > know that Stan is anxious but given the lack of interest in > the > > > > > core > > > > > > > > trunk, its hard to imagine we have enough support to sustain > this > > > > > > > > branch. Do we have firm committments from anyone else > besides > > > > > Stan? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 for a fork... the reason we need to get going asap and a > fork > > > > > helps. > > > > > > > If we wait for another bunch of issues to be fixed, this will > never > > > > > end. > > > > > > > Sorry to say that so harsh, but the time on 1.2 is really > pressing, > > > > > > > given that there wont be an option in jee to override the > default > > > > > JSF > > > > > > > implementation via other libs in WEB-INF/lib like it was > possible in > > > > > > JEE4 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > http://www.irian.at > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and > > > > > > Courses in English and German > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > http://www.irian.at > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and > > > > Courses in English and German > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > http://www.irian.at > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > > JSF Consulting, Development and > > > Courses in English and German > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > >
