Hi Craig, critical fixes to 1.1. -> 1.1 branch
major development --> trunk special things for 1.2 under TC6 only --> 1.2 branch With this, it should be albe to merge down the 1.2 branch to the trunk, right? regards, Martin On 5/22/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/21/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, > > one more addition to the discussion - I'll want to branches. One for > JSF1.2 things which cannot be used together with Tomcat 5.5 and, one > for JSF1.2 things which can be used with Tomcat 5.5. I'd love trunk to > be the JSF1.2/Tomcat 5.5 branch, and have bug fixes for 1.1 on a real > branch. > > summary: > > 1.1 --> branch > 1.2 Tomcat 6 --> branch > 1.2 Tomcat 5.5. --> trunk > > is that ok? Wouldn't this mean that every change that worked under 5.5 would need to be committed to both branches? That seems like a good way to slow down the effort to achieve 1.2 compliance. > regards, > > Martin Craig > On 5/19/06, Stan Silvert < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That would be fine. After I am done we may need some help from Sean. > > He was talking about putting Tomcat 6 jars in an Apache Maven > > repository. > > > > I've been building with NetBeans and not Maven. So someone who is more > > Maven savvy will need to update things so it builds correctly. I don't > > think it will be more complicated than adding and removing some > > dependencies. > > > > Stan Silvert > > JBoss, Inc. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > callto://stansilvert > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Manfred Geiler [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 8:48 PM > > > To: MyFaces Development > > > Subject: Re: JSF 1.2 [was: Cancelled: JavaOne MyFaces > > > Committers/Contributors meeting] > > > > > > Sean, > > > Can you please make a copy of the current trunk to > > > /myfaces/core/branches/jsf_1_2 ? > > > After that, Stan can simply (?) merge his stuff inside that. > > > Is that ok, Stan? > > > > > > Manfred > > > > > > > > > On 5/18/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > You want a 1.2 branch for core only using the latest trunk right? I > > > > can create it for you if you want ... > > > > > > > > Sean > > > > > > > > On 5/18/06, Martin Marinschek < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Manfred, can you go ahead with that 1.2 branch? > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > Martin > > > > > > > > > > On 5/18/06, Thomas Spiegl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I'm having a look at tomahawk 416 > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 for creating a 1.2 branch > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/18/06, Stan Silvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > > > I have implemented most of the new core API's and fixed most > > of > > > the > > > > > > > deprecated ones to be backwards compatible with 1.1 (if you > > look > > > at the > > > > > > > 1.2 javadocs you'll see what I mean). If you look at the > > section > > > in the > > > > > > > spec preface entitled "What's Changed Since the Last Release" > > you > > > can > > > > > > > get a feel for what I did. I've pretty much done everything > > in > > > that > > > > > > > list. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Most of it is covered under this issue, which just says to > > > implement > > > > > > > several sections of the spec: > > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1274 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I believe all of 1274 is complete except > > > > > > > ApplicationImpl.getResourceBundle (). I needed code that reads > > the > > > new > > > > > > > faces-context.xml for that one. However, all the ELResolver > > stuff > > > is > > > > > > > done including the ResourceBundleELResolver. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've also done some of the issues listed under General > > Changes. > > > For > > > > > > > each item in that list, I created a Jira task. You can look > > at > > > Jira and > > > > > > > see which ones I did. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I was just getting started on the javax.faces.webapp package > > when > > > I was > > > > > > > taken off of the project. I probably won't commit any changes > > > from > > > > > > > that. I didn't touch the components or renderer at all. With > > all > > > the > > > > > > > backward-compatible code I wrote, it appears that all the > > > components > > > > > > > still work even though they are written the " 1.1 way". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, hopefully, what you guys will have to start with is a JSF > > 1.2 > > > impl > > > > > > > that is about half-way done and still works. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stan Silvert > > > > > > > JBoss, Inc. > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > callto://stansilvert > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > > From: Thomas Spiegl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:58 PM > > > > > > > > To: MyFaces Development; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: JSF 1.2 [was: Cancelled: JavaOne MyFaces > > > > > > > > Committers/Contributors meeting] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 for solving tomahawk 416, being incompatible to RI is a > > > serious > > > > > > > issue > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stan which 1.2 issues did you fix. Did you change any link > > > renderers? > > > > > > > > If not, i am > > > > > > > > +1 for open a 1.2 branch > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/17/06, Werner Punz < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Sean Schofield schrieb: > > > > > > > > > > I'm -1 on the 1.2 branch. There are major issues to be > > > fixed in > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > core right now. (See TOMAHAWK-416 and related dev > > > discussions.) > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > > know that Stan is anxious but given the lack of interest > > in > > > the > > > > > > > core > > > > > > > > > > trunk, its hard to imagine we have enough support to > > sustain > > > this > > > > > > > > > > branch. Do we have firm committments from anyone else > > > besides > > > > > > > Stan? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 for a fork... the reason we need to get going asap and > > a > > > fork > > > > > > > helps. > > > > > > > > > If we wait for another bunch of issues to be fixed, this > > will > > > never > > > > > > > end. > > > > > > > > > Sorry to say that so harsh, but the time on 1.2 is really > > > pressing, > > > > > > > > > given that there wont be an option in jee to override the > > > default > > > > > > > JSF > > > > > > > > > implementation via other libs in WEB-INF/lib like it was > > > possible in > > > > > > > > JEE4 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > http://www.irian.at > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and > > > > > > Courses in English and German > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and > > > > > Courses in English and German > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >
-- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
