On 5/21/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wouldn't this mean that every change that worked under 5.5 would need to be committed to both branches? That seems like a good way to slow down the effort to achieve 1.2 compliance.
Craig
Ok,
one more addition to the discussion - I'll want to branches. One for
JSF1.2 things which cannot be used together with Tomcat 5.5 and, one
for JSF1.2 things which can be used with Tomcat 5.5. I'd love trunk to
be the JSF1.2/Tomcat 5.5 branch, and have bug fixes for 1.1 on a real
branch.
summary:
1.1 --> branch
1.2 Tomcat 6 --> branch
1.2 Tomcat 5.5. --> trunk
is that ok?
Wouldn't this mean that every change that worked under 5.5 would need to be committed to both branches? That seems like a good way to slow down the effort to achieve 1.2 compliance.
regards,
Martin
Craig
On 5/19/06, Stan Silvert < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That would be fine. After I am done we may need some help from Sean.
> He was talking about putting Tomcat 6 jars in an Apache Maven
> repository.
>
> I've been building with NetBeans and not Maven. So someone who is more
> Maven savvy will need to update things so it builds correctly. I don't
> think it will be more complicated than adding and removing some
> dependencies.
>
> Stan Silvert
> JBoss, Inc.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> callto://stansilvert
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Manfred Geiler [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 8:48 PM
> > To: MyFaces Development
> > Subject: Re: JSF 1.2 [was: Cancelled: JavaOne MyFaces
> > Committers/Contributors meeting]
> >
> > Sean,
> > Can you please make a copy of the current trunk to
> > /myfaces/core/branches/jsf_1_2 ?
> > After that, Stan can simply (?) merge his stuff inside that.
> > Is that ok, Stan?
> >
> > Manfred
> >
> >
> > On 5/18/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > You want a 1.2 branch for core only using the latest trunk right? I
> > > can create it for you if you want ...
> > >
> > > Sean
> > >
> > > On 5/18/06, Martin Marinschek < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Manfred, can you go ahead with that 1.2 branch?
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > >
> > > > Martin
> > > >
> > > > On 5/18/06, Thomas Spiegl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > I'm having a look at tomahawk 416
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 for creating a 1.2 branch
> > > > >
> > > > > On 5/18/06, Stan Silvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > > > > I have implemented most of the new core API's and fixed most
> of
> > the
> > > > > > deprecated ones to be backwards compatible with 1.1 (if you
> look
> > at the
> > > > > > 1.2 javadocs you'll see what I mean). If you look at the
> section
> > in the
> > > > > > spec preface entitled "What's Changed Since the Last Release"
> you
> > can
> > > > > > get a feel for what I did. I've pretty much done everything
> in
> > that
> > > > > > list.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Most of it is covered under this issue, which just says to
> > implement
> > > > > > several sections of the spec:
> > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1274
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I believe all of 1274 is complete except
> > > > > > ApplicationImpl.getResourceBundle (). I needed code that reads
> the
> > new
> > > > > > faces-context.xml for that one. However, all the ELResolver
> stuff
> > is
> > > > > > done including the ResourceBundleELResolver.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I've also done some of the issues listed under General
> Changes.
> > For
> > > > > > each item in that list, I created a Jira task. You can look
> at
> > Jira and
> > > > > > see which ones I did.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I was just getting started on the javax.faces.webapp package
> when
> > I was
> > > > > > taken off of the project. I probably won't commit any changes
> > from
> > > > > > that. I didn't touch the components or renderer at all. With
> all
> > the
> > > > > > backward-compatible code I wrote, it appears that all the
> > components
> > > > > > still work even though they are written the " 1.1 way".
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So, hopefully, what you guys will have to start with is a JSF
> 1.2
> > impl
> > > > > > that is about half-way done and still works.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Stan Silvert
> > > > > > JBoss, Inc.
> > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > callto://stansilvert
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: Thomas Spiegl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
> > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:58 PM
> > > > > > > To: MyFaces Development; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: JSF 1.2 [was: Cancelled: JavaOne MyFaces
> > > > > > > Committers/Contributors meeting]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 for solving tomahawk 416, being incompatible to RI is a
> > serious
> > > > > > issue
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Stan which 1.2 issues did you fix. Did you change any link
> > renderers?
> > > > > > > If not, i am
> > > > > > > +1 for open a 1.2 branch
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 5/17/06, Werner Punz < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Sean Schofield schrieb:
> > > > > > > > > I'm -1 on the 1.2 branch. There are major issues to be
> > fixed in
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > core right now. (See TOMAHAWK-416 and related dev
> > discussions.)
> > > > > > I
> > > > > > > > > know that Stan is anxious but given the lack of interest
> in
> > the
> > > > > > core
> > > > > > > > > trunk, its hard to imagine we have enough support to
> sustain
> > this
> > > > > > > > > branch. Do we have firm committments from anyone else
> > besides
> > > > > > Stan?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1 for a fork... the reason we need to get going asap and
> a
> > fork
> > > > > > helps.
> > > > > > > > If we wait for another bunch of issues to be fixed, this
> will
> > never
> > > > > > end.
> > > > > > > > Sorry to say that so harsh, but the time on 1.2 is really
> > pressing,
> > > > > > > > given that there wont be an option in jee to override the
> > default
> > > > > > JSF
> > > > > > > > implementation via other libs in WEB-INF/lib like it was
> > possible in
> > > > > > > JEE4
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > >
> > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > >
> > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > >
> > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > Courses in English and German
> > > >
> > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > >
> > >
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
