As far as I can see, we never ever try to release a version out of the 1.2tc6 branch. So no need to do any special maintainance with this branch - just an archive.
This part confuses me. I was under the impression that Stan was 90% of the way there. So why would we plan on abandoning this work in favor of a watered down version? I still haven't heard a compelling reason for two different branches for JSF 1.2 supported by two different groups of MyFaces committers. We've got 5 - 6 active committers that work on the core on a regular basis. If what Stan has done independently doesn't suit us, then we can choose to ignore it. (I can't say since I haven't looked at it.) But I don't think we should just throw it in to SVN and then start working on a less complete version that works on Tomcat 5. What features of JSF 1.2 that don't require Tomcat do people think we need right *now*?
Ciao, Mario
Sean
