On 5/24/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There's a separate issue as well ... a partial implementation of 1.2 couldn't pass the TCK, and therefore couldn't be released, either.
> As far as I can see, we never ever try to release a version out of the
> 1.2tc6 branch. So no need to do any special maintainance with this
> branch - just an archive.
This part confuses me. I was under the impression that Stan was 90%
of the way there. So why would we plan on abandoning this work in
favor of a watered down version? I still haven't heard a compelling
reason for two different branches for JSF 1.2 supported by two
different groups of MyFaces committers. We've got 5 - 6 active
committers that work on the core on a regular basis.
If what Stan has done independently doesn't suit us, then we can
choose to ignore it. (I can't say since I haven't looked at it.) But
I don't think we should just throw it in to SVN and then start working
on a less complete version that works on Tomcat 5. What features of
JSF 1.2 that don't require Tomcat do people think we need right *now*?
There's a separate issue as well ... a partial implementation of 1.2 couldn't pass the TCK, and therefore couldn't be released, either.
> Ciao,
> Mario
Sean
Craig
