Shared 202 and core 1.1.4 were branched at the same time? If so, I say yes. Please keep in mind that this means a new release candidate. Please believe me when I say that I want this wrapped and ready to go just as fast as any of you, but RCX != RC(X+1) .
Yes, Dennis. Sure! I agree! It is a *different* piece of software and the time the first RC spent in limbo mode simply doesn't count. It failed. That means you have to start over. Sorry, but one quick way to end up on Hani's blog is to release this thing w/out going through a full TCK run, following by an RC announcement, following by some reasonable amount of time.
Sure, I agree that we need to "start over" again! No big deal. I set up the environment and provide you new RC JARs. Makes sense ?
>> Maybe I am missing something here, but I don't see why we can't just change the core 1.1.4 branch to depend on a branch for shared that was created ( or could be created ) at the same time. >> >> >Also, as you mentioned, we need a unit test for this to see if >> >whatever we do fixes things. Care to write one? Or maybe you can at >> >least elaborate on the bug description in JIRA so someone else can >> >write one. I just know the revision that you think broke things. I >> >don't know what the problem is. >> >> A good test for this would be to simulate Mike's web.xml in the Shale Mock environment. However I don't see why this is necessary until a 1.1.5 release. Is there any reason why 1368 is even an issue for the 1.1.4 release ? As Sean pointed out, it didn't even enter the code base until after the branch. > >ok > >> >> >Sean >> > >> >On 7/31/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >OK I missed this one: >> >> >> >> Hi Sean - "missed this" how? >> >> myfaces/shared/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/myfaces/shared/util/StateUtils.java >> >> > >> >> >If we revert this change do we think this will fix the problem? I can >> >> >certainly take care of that ... >> >> >> >> I am fairly sure reverting this will fix 1368, but I do not see how that should only affect anything other than trunk once the pom in the 1.1.4 branch is pointed to the correct shared version. >> >> >> >> >Sean >> >> > >> >> >On 7/31/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> Sorry. Missed the bit about the shared branch in the wiki. I thought >> >> >> Matthias had told me that he created it. >> >> >> >> >> >> Sean >> >> >> >> >> >> On 7/31/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> > On 7/31/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> > > I guess there was no branch made for the shared project at the same >> >> >> > > time that the core branched? If so we need to make a branch now >> >> >> > > (retroactively) and make sure it does not include the problematic >> >> >> > > code. Then change the dependency in the core pom. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > This page is intended to capture information about the release, >> >> >> > including what branches were made and when: >> >> >> > >> >> >> > http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/CoreRelease114 >> >> >> > >> >> >> > As Matthias mentioned, he branched shared and core at the same time. >> >> >> > But that was on June 21, and the commit mentioned on MYFACES-1368 was >> >> >> > on July 4th. It can't be in the branch unless it was merged in. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > We also have a STATUS document which lists the trunks and active branches: >> >> >> > >> >> >> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/current/STATUS.txt >> >> >> > >> >> >> > If anything is missing, please add it. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > -- >> >> >> > Wendy >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > > >-- >Matthias Wessendorf > >further stuff: >blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf >mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com >
-- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
