yes, -0
:-) On 5/14/07, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Good point! I revise my vote to -0 regards, Manfred On 5/14/07, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > I am -0 on placing Continuum messages on a different mailing list > > because I like seeing the commit message(s) followed by a Continuum > > success/failure message. The Continuum message is a nice confirmation > > that the commit(s) did or did not break the build. Email clients can > > be configured to filter messages if the user prefers to not see the > > Continuum message or see the message in a different folder. The > > converse can also be said, filtering commit and Continuum messages > > into the same folder. > Yep, these are my thoughts too. > > When Continuum is running stable I really prefer its messages showing up > after the commit. Even a newbie developer should see that every commit > triggers an (nearly) immediate action. > In the end every developer should subscribe to the continuum > notification list too ... so no need to split them. > > Ciao, > Mario > > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
-- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
