Well, we were talking about this in past, and in the past (14 month ago or so), we agreed to keep MyFaces 1.1.x to be the trunk. Now, we have a (first) release of MyFaces 1.2.x out there, so it *might* make more sense now, than in the past. However, we recently asked, but we never heard much back for others (7 "votes"). Therefore an "official" vote was needed.
Glad you jumped in. It's not that we need to "push" this, now. I am personally fine in switching to 1.2.x (on trunk) later. Looks like we need to discuss this, in more details. Perhaps it's good to wait, and try to get a *first* step into a version of Tomahawk/Tobago that are JSF-1.2-style. -Matthias On 7/19/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Got a question here: making the JSF 1.2 core trunk seems like a no-brainer. But what about Tomahawk and Trinidad? Will those switch over to be JSF 1.2-based on their trunks, or should we keep JSF 1.1 as the basis for their trunks? The coder in me wants to bump to JSF 1.2, but it's hard to imagine that the community in general is ready. WDYT? -- Adam On 7/19/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > yeah, I'll do that now :) > > I guess, this topic also become more attention, when it's a vote ;) > > -M > > On 7/19/07, Paul McMahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jul 19, 2007, at 4:24 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > > > > I'd prefer a vote, to be honest. Yeah, we become vote-happy :-))) > > > > Votes are cheap :-) > > > > > > Best wishes, > > Paul > > > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > further stuff: > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org >
-- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
