jup, I have something more sitting in my queue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-13 (when it arrives, I will handle this)
-Matthias On 7/26/07, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here is some further information on "Intellectual Property Clearance". http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html regards, Martin On 7/26/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > this is exceptionally great news. The question is now how we can move in the > > code. The old question that arises now is incubator versus code grant. > > even a software grant has be to discussed on [EMAIL PROTECTED] as well. > > > The question that we'll need to answer is how the community that so far has > > developed the code is structured. > > > > Main question: Can and will the code be further developed by mostly persons > > who are already member of the MyFaces community, or does community building > > have to occurr? > > > > Both Scott and me will be active in the development, we both are active in > > the Trinidad/MyFaces community, so this is a plus. I would guess that also > > Stan will be interested. So, I think that we as a community will be able to > > handle the code easily. > > Scott is already ASF committer, like you and Stan. > Also others here, not committers (yet), have provided feedback > regarding JSF + portlet. > Form that side, all is fine :) > > -Matthias > > > I would tend to think that in this case, a direct code grant would be ok, > > what does everyone else think? > > > > regards, > > > > Martin > > > > > > On 7/25/07, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Dennis, > > > > > > I checked with the project lead for JSR-301 and he said licensing for > > > the TCK is still up in the air. It is his intention to publish it under > > > the Apache 2.0 license but I believe he is still trying to work out the > > > logistics with Sun to make sure that Oracle can comply with the JCP. > > > > > > He said that until the logistics of the TCK are worked out, he would > > > like to contribute some testing code to the subproject here at Apache > > > and would ultimately like those unit tests to drive the TCK. But the > > > TCK is, in large part, a piece of the JCP which gauges compliance of > > > various implementations so we need to play nicely with them. > > > > > > Scott > > > > > > Scott O'Bryan wrote: > > > > One more comment, the unit tests that will hopefully be made as part > > > > of the Maven build will be developed as part of this project and I > > > > have hopes they will be a lot more comprehensive then the tests > > > > provided by the TCK. :) That's up to the community to help with that > > > > however. > > > > > > > > Scott > > > > > > > > Scott O'Bryan wrote: > > > >> I'll double check, but I think the TCK will be liscenced using the > > > >> Apache 2.0, it's just that Oracle will maintain the copyrights. As > > > >> per agreements with the JCP, the TCK can only enforce the > > > >> specification which is developed by the Java Community EG. I know > > > >> Martin is on the Expert Group representing Apache and so am I > > > >> (representing Trinidad and the new Rich Renderkit we'll be donating > > > >> soon). So the TCK can be influenced though that process. > > > >> > > > >> IMO, it's very much the same relationship that MyFaces has with the > > > >> JSF TCK which is developed by Sun, except that because the code > > > >> developed by the Apache community will be used as the R.I., the > > > >> Apache community has a much better chance to influence both the TCK > > > >> and the future of the standard Portlet Bridge. > > > >> > > > >> Scott > > > >> > > > >> Dennis Byrne wrote: > > > >>> believe the TCK will be developed in-house at Oracle, but the > > > >>> > > > >>> development of the 301 bridge itself will be done as part of > > > >>> MyFaces > > > >>> community. > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> Hello Scott. Does Oracle have control of the TCK licensing? If so, > > > >>> what are the chances of having anonymous read access to the code, > > > >>> and a license that lets us keep this in the continuous integration > > > >>> loop right next the unit tests. Thanks > > > >>> > > > >>> Thanks, > > > >>> Scott > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> -- > > > >>> Dennis Byrne > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > http://www.irian.at > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > JSF Consulting, Development and > > Courses in English and German > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > further stuff: > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
-- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
