On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 19:57 +0200, Mario Ivankovits wrote: > Simon, > > any reason you called it BasicFrameworkAdapter and not > ServletFrameworkAdapter or ServletContainerFrameworkAdapter? > Basic sound like basic for all implementations and not just servlet > container based ones.
The name ServletFrameworkAdapter sounded too much like FrameworkAdapterServlet to me. I thought it was confusing. Although BasicFrameworkAdapter isn't perfect I agree. Do you think it is possible or reasonable to port Orchestra to a non-servlet environment? I know they exist (eg RIFE) but would be very surprised if Orchestra could be reasonably ported to such an environment. Regards, Simon
