> The name ServletFrameworkAdapter sounded too much like > FrameworkAdapterServlet to me. I thought it was confusing. > > Although BasicFrameworkAdapter isn't perfect I agree. > > Do you think it is possible or reasonable to port Orchestra to a non-servlet > environment? I know they exist (eg RIFE) but would be very surprised if > Orchestra could be reasonably ported to such an environment. > I don't think something like this would ever happen, but who knows? ;-)
What about ServletContainerFrameworkAdapter? Or HttpFrameworkAdapter as effectively one needs a session to run Orchestra which is provided only by http environments in our case. Ciao, Mario
