> Maybe "PlainServletFrameworkAdapter", to indicate that this adapter does not > depend on anything other than the plain javax.servlet apis? > Or just ServletFrameworkAdapter as you originally suggested...plus good > javadoc to explain the name. > Or leave it as BasicFrameworkAdapter, and add better docs to explain it > depends on only the "basic" servlet api. > > Feel free to make whatever choice you prefer here; I'm not desperately > attached to any particular name :-) > Nor am I, so lets go with Basic.
Ciao, Mario
