I like MFPB On 10/18/07, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Done. > > BTW, I remember a discussion about the Jira key "JSR301". Reason for > the discussion was that it's no ideal name, because there might be a > time after jsr 301... > Well, renaming a Jira key is not possible. > What I could do is create a knew Jira project and bulk move all issues. > But first we would have to find a proper key. > MFPB for MyFaces portlet bridge? > or JSFPB? > Other suggestions? > > --Manfred > > > On 10/18/07, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sure Manfred. If you would. I can then go and assign the existing Jira > > tickets in the appropriate categories. > > > > BTW, thanks sooo much for all your help in this... > > > > Scott > > > > Manfred Geiler wrote: > > > So, there would be 4 new Jira "components" for the bridge: > > > api > > > impl > > > documentation > > > testing > > > > > > right? > > > should I add them right now? > > > > > > --Manfred > > > > > > > > > On 10/18/07, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> Hey guys, assuming there are not objections from incubator, I'm doing > > >> what I can to try to get the bridge project ready so we can hit the > > >> ground running. I was wondering what you guys thought about adding a > > >> couple of components to the jsr-301 jira project. > > >> > > >> First off, I would like to add impl and api components to this project. > > >> As an R.I., the api for this project will be largely dictated by the > > >> spec. Therefore bugs filed against the API should be handled with more > > >> scrutiny then changes to impl need to be. > > >> > > >> Secondly, I would like to see a separate component for documentation as > > >> I will expect there will be a lot added here. > > >> > > >> Third, it MIGHT be nice to add a "testing" component. I know that > > >> testing tasks could be included in the api and impl components, but part > > >> of the requirements for the testing suite for this project should be > > >> able ensuring compliance with the TCK. As an R.I., I know I personally > > >> would want to see these tests be as accurate as possible to ensure that > > >> the R.I. correctly implements the JSR-301 specification. > > >> > > >> What do you guys think? > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> Scott > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > http://www.irian.at > Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, > Development and Courses in English and > German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >
-- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
