Done.
Scott, could you please doublecheck the new project with name "PORTLETBRIDGE".
Hope you had not already assigned Components to issues because they
seem to be lost.
FYI: I also had to manually assign "1.0.0-SNAPSHOT" as "affected
version" to all issues, hope that is ok.

--Manfred


On 10/19/07, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well there you go.  PortletBridge has my vote.
>
> Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> > PORTLETBRIDGE is shorter than
> > GERONIMODEVTOOLS, so I think we're good with that :-)
> >
> >
> > On 10/18/07, Michael Freedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> PortletBridge would be great as long as we can use that many characters.
> >>
> >> If folks prefer a codename I offer "Ponte".
> >>
> >> Ponte means bridge in Italian.
> >>     -Mike-
> >>
> >> Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hmm.  +1 to PortletBridge.  It's the closest we have to what the
> >>> subproject is likely to be named.
> >>>
> >>> Scott
> >>>
> >>> Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Either a codename or PortletBridge would make the most sense to me.
> >>>>
> >>>> On 10/18/07, Michael Freedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>  Any chance we can keep it simple/straightforward -- the other Keys
> >>>>> seem to
> >>>>> do this ... like:
> >>>>>  Portlet Bridge
> >>>>>  Bridge
> >>>>>  Portlet
> >>>>>  PltBridge
> >>>>>  PBridge
> >>>>>
> >>>>>    -Mike-
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  Manfred Geiler wrote:
> >>>>>  Done.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> BTW, I remember a discussion about the Jira key "JSR301". Reason for
> >>>>> the discussion was that it's no ideal name, because there might be a
> >>>>> time after jsr 301...
> >>>>> Well, renaming a Jira key is not possible.
> >>>>> What I could do is create a knew Jira project and bulk move all issues.
> >>>>> But first we would have to find a proper key.
> >>>>> MFPB for MyFaces portlet bridge?
> >>>>> or JSFPB?
> >>>>> Other suggestions?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --Manfred
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 10/18/07, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  Sure Manfred. If you would. I can then go and assign the existing Jira
> >>>>> tickets in the appropriate categories.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> BTW, thanks sooo much for all your help in this...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Scott
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Manfred Geiler wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  So, there would be 4 new Jira "components" for the bridge:
> >>>>>  api
> >>>>>  impl
> >>>>>  documentation
> >>>>>  testing
> >>>>>
> >>>>> right?
> >>>>> should I add them right now?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --Manfred
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 10/18/07, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  Hey guys, assuming there are not objections from incubator, I'm doing
> >>>>> what I can to try to get the bridge project ready so we can hit the
> >>>>> ground running. I was wondering what you guys thought about adding a
> >>>>> couple of components to the jsr-301 jira project.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> First off, I would like to add impl and api components to this project.
> >>>>> As an R.I., the api for this project will be largely dictated by the
> >>>>> spec. Therefore bugs filed against the API should be handled with more
> >>>>> scrutiny then changes to impl need to be.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Secondly, I would like to see a separate component for documentation as
> >>>>> I will expect there will be a lot added here.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Third, it MIGHT be nice to add a "testing" component. I know that
> >>>>> testing tasks could be included in the api and impl components, but
> >>>>> part
> >>>>> of the requirements for the testing suite for this project should be
> >>>>> able ensuring compliance with the TCK. As an R.I., I know I personally
> >>>>> would want to see these tests be as accurate as possible to ensure that
> >>>>> the R.I. correctly implements the JSR-301 specification.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What do you guys think?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>  Scott
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >
> >
>
>


-- 
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting,
Development and Courses in English and
German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

Reply via email to