Tito?! Might lead to wrong connotation: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tito ;-)
Ok, now: MFPB or JSFPB? Let's give others enough time to share this discussion. I do not want to create this project a third time! ;-) --Manfred On 10/18/07, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Or we could give it a codename like Tito or something... :) > > Scott O'Bryan wrote: > > Yeah. I like JSFPB but it doesn't matter to me. I wasn't sweating > > the JSR-301 in JIRA too much because the decription of the project was > > accurate. But if you're offering to fix it, I think it would be better. > > > > Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > >> I like MFPB > >> > >> On 10/18/07, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> Done. > >>> > >>> BTW, I remember a discussion about the Jira key "JSR301". Reason for > >>> the discussion was that it's no ideal name, because there might be a > >>> time after jsr 301... > >>> Well, renaming a Jira key is not possible. > >>> What I could do is create a knew Jira project and bulk move all issues. > >>> But first we would have to find a proper key. > >>> MFPB for MyFaces portlet bridge? > >>> or JSFPB? > >>> Other suggestions? > >>> > >>> --Manfred > >>> > >>> > >>> On 10/18/07, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Sure Manfred. If you would. I can then go and assign the existing > >>>> Jira > >>>> tickets in the appropriate categories. > >>>> > >>>> BTW, thanks sooo much for all your help in this... > >>>> > >>>> Scott > >>>> > >>>> Manfred Geiler wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> So, there would be 4 new Jira "components" for the bridge: > >>>>> api > >>>>> impl > >>>>> documentation > >>>>> testing > >>>>> > >>>>> right? > >>>>> should I add them right now? > >>>>> > >>>>> --Manfred > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On 10/18/07, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hey guys, assuming there are not objections from incubator, I'm > >>>>>> doing > >>>>>> what I can to try to get the bridge project ready so we can hit the > >>>>>> ground running. I was wondering what you guys thought about > >>>>>> adding a > >>>>>> couple of components to the jsr-301 jira project. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> First off, I would like to add impl and api components to this > >>>>>> project. > >>>>>> As an R.I., the api for this project will be largely dictated by the > >>>>>> spec. Therefore bugs filed against the API should be handled > >>>>>> with more > >>>>>> scrutiny then changes to impl need to be. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Secondly, I would like to see a separate component for > >>>>>> documentation as > >>>>>> I will expect there will be a lot added here. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Third, it MIGHT be nice to add a "testing" component. I know that > >>>>>> testing tasks could be included in the api and impl components, > >>>>>> but part > >>>>>> of the requirements for the testing suite for this project should be > >>>>>> able ensuring compliance with the TCK. As an R.I., I know I > >>>>>> personally > >>>>>> would want to see these tests be as accurate as possible to > >>>>>> ensure that > >>>>>> the R.I. correctly implements the JSR-301 specification. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> What do you guys think? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>> Scott > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> -- > >>> http://www.irian.at > >>> Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, > >>> Development and Courses in English and > >>> German > >>> > >>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
