Tito?!
Might lead to wrong connotation: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tito
;-)

Ok, now:
MFPB or JSFPB?
Let's give others enough time to share this discussion. I do not want
to create this project a third time!  ;-)

--Manfred


On 10/18/07, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Or we could give it a codename like Tito or something...  :)
>
> Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> > Yeah.  I like JSFPB but it doesn't matter to me.  I wasn't sweating
> > the JSR-301 in JIRA too much because the decription of the project was
> > accurate.  But if you're offering to fix it, I think it would be better.
> >
> > Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> >> I like MFPB
> >>
> >> On 10/18/07, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Done.
> >>>
> >>> BTW, I remember a discussion about the Jira key "JSR301". Reason for
> >>> the discussion was that it's no ideal name, because there might be a
> >>> time after jsr 301...
> >>> Well, renaming a Jira key is not possible.
> >>> What I could do is create a knew Jira project and bulk move all issues.
> >>> But first we would have to find a proper key.
> >>> MFPB for MyFaces portlet bridge?
> >>> or JSFPB?
> >>> Other suggestions?
> >>>
> >>> --Manfred
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 10/18/07, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Sure Manfred.  If you would.  I can then go and assign the existing
> >>>> Jira
> >>>> tickets in the appropriate categories.
> >>>>
> >>>> BTW, thanks sooo much for all your help in this...
> >>>>
> >>>> Scott
> >>>>
> >>>> Manfred Geiler wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> So, there would be 4 new Jira "components" for the bridge:
> >>>>>  api
> >>>>>  impl
> >>>>>  documentation
> >>>>>  testing
> >>>>>
> >>>>> right?
> >>>>> should I add them right now?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --Manfred
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 10/18/07, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hey guys, assuming there are not objections from incubator, I'm
> >>>>>> doing
> >>>>>> what I can to try to get the bridge project ready so we can hit the
> >>>>>> ground running.  I was wondering what you guys thought about
> >>>>>> adding a
> >>>>>> couple of components to the jsr-301 jira project.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> First off, I would like to add impl and api components to this
> >>>>>> project.
> >>>>>> As an R.I., the api for this project will be largely dictated by the
> >>>>>> spec.  Therefore bugs filed against the API should be handled
> >>>>>> with more
> >>>>>> scrutiny then changes to impl need to be.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Secondly, I would like to see a separate component for
> >>>>>> documentation as
> >>>>>> I will expect there will be a lot added here.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Third, it MIGHT be nice to add a "testing" component.  I know that
> >>>>>> testing tasks could be included in the api and impl components,
> >>>>>> but part
> >>>>>> of the requirements for the testing suite for this project should be
> >>>>>> able ensuring compliance with the TCK.  As an R.I., I know I
> >>>>>> personally
> >>>>>> would want to see these tests be as accurate as possible to
> >>>>>> ensure that
> >>>>>> the R.I. correctly implements the JSR-301 specification.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> What do you guys think?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>   Scott
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>> --
> >>> http://www.irian.at
> >>> Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting,
> >>> Development and Courses in English and
> >>> German
> >>>
> >>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>


-- 
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting,
Development and Courses in English and
German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

Reply via email to