Yes, yes - I've also done a short search, and ponte seems to be used
by other software projects, so forget it.

regards,

Martin

On 10/19/07, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, too late, Martin...  :-(
>
> On 10/19/07, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You can surely take portlet-bridge - I like Ponte better, however...
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 10/19/07, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Done.
> > > Scott, could you please doublecheck the new project with name 
> > > "PORTLETBRIDGE".
> > > Hope you had not already assigned Components to issues because they
> > > seem to be lost.
> > > FYI: I also had to manually assign "1.0.0-SNAPSHOT" as "affected
> > > version" to all issues, hope that is ok.
> > >
> > > --Manfred
> > >
> > >
> > > On 10/19/07, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Well there you go.  PortletBridge has my vote.
> > > >
> > > > Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> > > > > PORTLETBRIDGE is shorter than
> > > > > GERONIMODEVTOOLS, so I think we're good with that :-)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 10/18/07, Michael Freedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> PortletBridge would be great as long as we can use that many 
> > > > >> characters.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> If folks prefer a codename I offer "Ponte".
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Ponte means bridge in Italian.
> > > > >>     -Mike-
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Hmm.  +1 to PortletBridge.  It's the closest we have to what the
> > > > >>> subproject is likely to be named.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Scott
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> Either a codename or PortletBridge would make the most sense to me.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> On 10/18/07, Michael Freedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>>  Any chance we can keep it simple/straightforward -- the other 
> > > > >>>>> Keys
> > > > >>>>> seem to
> > > > >>>>> do this ... like:
> > > > >>>>>  Portlet Bridge
> > > > >>>>>  Bridge
> > > > >>>>>  Portlet
> > > > >>>>>  PltBridge
> > > > >>>>>  PBridge
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>    -Mike-
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>  Manfred Geiler wrote:
> > > > >>>>>  Done.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> BTW, I remember a discussion about the Jira key "JSR301". Reason 
> > > > >>>>> for
> > > > >>>>> the discussion was that it's no ideal name, because there might 
> > > > >>>>> be a
> > > > >>>>> time after jsr 301...
> > > > >>>>> Well, renaming a Jira key is not possible.
> > > > >>>>> What I could do is create a knew Jira project and bulk move all 
> > > > >>>>> issues.
> > > > >>>>> But first we would have to find a proper key.
> > > > >>>>> MFPB for MyFaces portlet bridge?
> > > > >>>>> or JSFPB?
> > > > >>>>> Other suggestions?
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> --Manfred
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> On 10/18/07, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>  Sure Manfred. If you would. I can then go and assign the 
> > > > >>>>> existing Jira
> > > > >>>>> tickets in the appropriate categories.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> BTW, thanks sooo much for all your help in this...
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Scott
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Manfred Geiler wrote:
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>  So, there would be 4 new Jira "components" for the bridge:
> > > > >>>>>  api
> > > > >>>>>  impl
> > > > >>>>>  documentation
> > > > >>>>>  testing
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> right?
> > > > >>>>> should I add them right now?
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> --Manfred
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> On 10/18/07, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>  Hey guys, assuming there are not objections from incubator, I'm 
> > > > >>>>> doing
> > > > >>>>> what I can to try to get the bridge project ready so we can hit 
> > > > >>>>> the
> > > > >>>>> ground running. I was wondering what you guys thought about 
> > > > >>>>> adding a
> > > > >>>>> couple of components to the jsr-301 jira project.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> First off, I would like to add impl and api components to this 
> > > > >>>>> project.
> > > > >>>>> As an R.I., the api for this project will be largely dictated by 
> > > > >>>>> the
> > > > >>>>> spec. Therefore bugs filed against the API should be handled with 
> > > > >>>>> more
> > > > >>>>> scrutiny then changes to impl need to be.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Secondly, I would like to see a separate component for 
> > > > >>>>> documentation as
> > > > >>>>> I will expect there will be a lot added here.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Third, it MIGHT be nice to add a "testing" component. I know that
> > > > >>>>> testing tasks could be included in the api and impl components, 
> > > > >>>>> but
> > > > >>>>> part
> > > > >>>>> of the requirements for the testing suite for this project should 
> > > > >>>>> be
> > > > >>>>> able ensuring compliance with the TCK. As an R.I., I know I 
> > > > >>>>> personally
> > > > >>>>> would want to see these tests be as accurate as possible to 
> > > > >>>>> ensure that
> > > > >>>>> the R.I. correctly implements the JSR-301 specification.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> What do you guys think?
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Regards,
> > > > >>>>>  Scott
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > http://www.irian.at
> > > Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting,
> > > Development and Courses in English and
> > > German
> > >
> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
>
>
> --
> http://www.irian.at
> Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting,
> Development and Courses in English and
> German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>


-- 

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

Reply via email to