ok, my 1.2.4 will arrive on the weekend, or close to it. -M
On Nov 27, 2007 6:55 PM, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was waiting on the 1.2.4 release and a response from Jeanne > > > On Nov 27, 2007 2:21 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Andrew- > > > > any plans to start on this? > > I am about to provide the 1.2.4 release bits. > > Perhaps, it is not a bad idea, to have the *restructuring* done after that ? > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > On Nov 20, 2007 5:12 AM, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Summary of the vote: > > > > > > +1: 8 > > > 0: 0 (Matt altered his vote) > > > -1: 0 > > > > > > +1 votes: > > > Andrew Robinson > > > Grant Smith > > > Martin Marinschek > > > Scott O'Bryan > > > Jeanne Waldman > > > Matt Cooper > > > Gary Kind > > > Simon Lessard > > > > > > Jeanne, > > > > > > Since you handled the last 1.2.4 trunk creation and merge, could you > > > chime in with how this would be best handled? I was thinking of the > > > following: > > > > > > 1) update the WIKI with the new rule that committers are responsible > > > for maintaining their changes in both the trunk and the 1.2 trunk. > > > 2) when 1.2.4 is released: > > > 2a) tag the trunk (1.0.5) to label a cut off point > > > 2b) branch trunk_1.2.x from the 1.2.4 branch > > > 3) perform "ubermerge" from 1.0.5 inception to the tag > > > 4) inform committers that they must apply any trunk changes post-tag > > > to the 1.2 trunk and any changes going forward to both if applicable > > > > > > Opinions? > > > > > > > > > On 11/15/07, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Vote: > > > > Creation of > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk_1.2.x/ > > > > > > > > Justification: > > > > Once again trinidad lacking a trunk for 1.2 is giving me heartburn. > > > > I have been making changes to 1.0.5 and to be nice, I wanted to put > > > > them into 1.2 as well, but of course there is no home for 1.2.5 yet. > > > > Unlike the last time this was brought up, we now have an existing > > > > example as an argument to use as a standard: > > > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/trunk_1.2.x/ > > > > > > > > If it is good enough for core, should it not also be good enough for > > > > trinidad? > > > > > > > > Since "https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk/"; would > > > > remain untouched, this should remove any debates over JSF not being > > > > supported. > > > > > > > > Benefits: > > > > 1) 1.2 snapshots possible with continuum > > > > 2) 1.2 is kept up to date > > > > 3) easier merge during 1.2 release time and hopefully as a result a > > > > more stable product > > > > > > > > -Andrew > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > further stuff: > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
