Great news! I just added the trunk_1.2.x to continuum and started the build
-Matthias On Dec 7, 2007 3:43 AM, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Okay, the 1.2.x is building fine. Any status on the continuum / maven > snapshot deployment status? > > -Andrew > > > On Dec 4, 2007 10:01 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > let's share the work; > > > > I do 2) > > and you 1.b) > > > > :-) > > > > > > On Dec 4, 2007 5:59 PM, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The new trunk is up > > > > > > svn copy > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-1.2.4 > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk_1.2.x > > > > > > Committed revision 600997. > > > > > > > > > Now we need to: > > > > > > 1. decide how to get changes from 1.0.5 over > > > a) committer's responsibility > > > b) one person doing large merge > > > 2. set up nightly builds from this URL > > > > > > I am converting the pom versions in that new URL now. > > > > > > -Andrew > > > > > > > > > On Dec 3, 2007 9:54 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Andrew, > > > > > > > > the TAG for the 1.2.4 release is done. > > > > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-1.2.4/ > > > > (created in r599998) > > > > > > > > I'd suggest to use that revision as the base for the "1.2_X-trunk" > > > > (and the *real* trunk, > > > > to merge the "new" features in. > > > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > > > PS: so, it is pretty close to a 1.2.4, but that shouldn't stop the > > > > "two trunks" idea, at this point. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 30, 2007 8:06 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Andrew, > > > > > > > > > > today the plugins 1.2.5 will be out, I'll include them into the 1.2.4 > > > > > CORE > > > > > and I suggest to use the TAG for 1.2.4 (after the release is out), to > > > > > create > > > > > the "1.2-x trunk" > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 27, 2007 6:59 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > ok, my 1.2.4 will arrive on the weekend, or close to it. > > > > > > > > > > > > -M > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 27, 2007 6:55 PM, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > I was waiting on the 1.2.4 release and a response from Jeanne > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 27, 2007 2:21 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Andrew- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > any plans to start on this? > > > > > > > > I am about to provide the 1.2.4 release bits. > > > > > > > > Perhaps, it is not a bad idea, to have the *restructuring* done > > > > > > > > after that ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 20, 2007 5:12 AM, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Summary of the vote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1: 8 > > > > > > > > > 0: 0 (Matt altered his vote) > > > > > > > > > -1: 0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 votes: > > > > > > > > > Andrew Robinson > > > > > > > > > Grant Smith > > > > > > > > > Martin Marinschek > > > > > > > > > Scott O'Bryan > > > > > > > > > Jeanne Waldman > > > > > > > > > Matt Cooper > > > > > > > > > Gary Kind > > > > > > > > > Simon Lessard > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jeanne, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since you handled the last 1.2.4 trunk creation and merge, > > > > > > > > > could you > > > > > > > > > chime in with how this would be best handled? I was thinking > > > > > > > > > of the > > > > > > > > > following: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) update the WIKI with the new rule that committers are > > > > > > > > > responsible > > > > > > > > > for maintaining their changes in both the trunk and the 1.2 > > > > > > > > > trunk. > > > > > > > > > 2) when 1.2.4 is released: > > > > > > > > > 2a) tag the trunk (1.0.5) to label a cut off point > > > > > > > > > 2b) branch trunk_1.2.x from the 1.2.4 branch > > > > > > > > > 3) perform "ubermerge" from 1.0.5 inception to the tag > > > > > > > > > 4) inform committers that they must apply any trunk changes > > > > > > > > > post-tag > > > > > > > > > to the 1.2 trunk and any changes going forward to both if > > > > > > > > > applicable > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Opinions? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 11/15/07, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vote: > > > > > > > > > > Creation of > > > > > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk_1.2.x/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Justification: > > > > > > > > > > Once again trinidad lacking a trunk for 1.2 is giving me > > > > > > > > > > heartburn. > > > > > > > > > > I have been making changes to 1.0.5 and to be nice, I > > > > > > > > > > wanted to put > > > > > > > > > > them into 1.2 as well, but of course there is no home for > > > > > > > > > > 1.2.5 yet. > > > > > > > > > > Unlike the last time this was brought up, we now have an > > > > > > > > > > existing > > > > > > > > > > example as an argument to use as a standard: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/trunk_1.2.x/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If it is good enough for core, should it not also be good > > > > > > > > > > enough for trinidad? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since > > > > > > > > > > "https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk/"; > > > > > > > > > > would > > > > > > > > > > remain untouched, this should remove any debates over JSF > > > > > > > > > > not being > > > > > > > > > > supported. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Benefits: > > > > > > > > > > 1) 1.2 snapshots possible with continuum > > > > > > > > > > 2) 1.2 is kept up to date > > > > > > > > > > 3) easier merge during 1.2 release time and hopefully as a > > > > > > > > > > result a > > > > > > > > > > more stable product > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Andrew > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff: > > > > > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > > > > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > > > > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > > > > > further stuff: > > > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > > > further stuff: > > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > further stuff: > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > further stuff: > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
