Andrew,

the TAG for the 1.2.4 release is done.

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-1.2.4/
(created in r599998)

I'd suggest to use that revision as the base for the "1.2_X-trunk"
(and the *real* trunk,
to merge the "new" features in.

-Matthias

PS: so, it is pretty close to a 1.2.4, but that shouldn't stop the
"two trunks" idea, at this point.

On Nov 30, 2007 8:06 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> today the plugins 1.2.5 will be out, I'll include them into the 1.2.4 CORE
> and I suggest to use the TAG for 1.2.4 (after the release is out), to create
> the "1.2-x trunk"
>
> -Matthias
>
>
> On Nov 27, 2007 6:59 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ok, my 1.2.4 will arrive on the weekend, or close to it.
> >
> > -M
> >
> >
> > On Nov 27, 2007 6:55 PM, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I was waiting on the 1.2.4 release and a response from Jeanne
> > >
> > >
> > > On Nov 27, 2007 2:21 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Andrew-
> > > >
> > > > any plans to start on this?
> > > > I am about to provide the 1.2.4 release bits.
> > > > Perhaps, it is not a bad idea, to have the *restructuring* done after 
> > > > that ?
> > > >
> > > > -Matthias
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Nov 20, 2007 5:12 AM, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Summary of the vote:
> > > > >
> > > > > +1: 8
> > > > > 0: 0 (Matt altered his vote)
> > > > > -1: 0
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 votes:
> > > > > Andrew Robinson
> > > > > Grant Smith
> > > > > Martin Marinschek
> > > > > Scott O'Bryan
> > > > > Jeanne Waldman
> > > > > Matt Cooper
> > > > > Gary Kind
> > > > > Simon Lessard
> > > > >
> > > > > Jeanne,
> > > > >
> > > > > Since you handled the last 1.2.4 trunk creation and merge, could you
> > > > > chime in with how this would be best handled? I was thinking of the
> > > > > following:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1) update the WIKI with the new rule that committers are responsible
> > > > > for maintaining their changes in both the trunk and the 1.2 trunk.
> > > > > 2) when 1.2.4 is released:
> > > > > 2a) tag the trunk (1.0.5) to label a cut off point
> > > > > 2b) branch trunk_1.2.x from the 1.2.4 branch
> > > > > 3) perform "ubermerge" from 1.0.5 inception to the tag
> > > > > 4) inform committers that they must apply any trunk changes post-tag
> > > > > to the 1.2 trunk and any changes going forward to both if applicable
> > > > >
> > > > > Opinions?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 11/15/07, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Vote:
> > > > > >   Creation of 
> > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk_1.2.x/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Justification:
> > > > > > Once again trinidad lacking a trunk for 1.2 is giving me heartburn.
> > > > > > I have been making changes to 1.0.5 and to be nice, I wanted to put
> > > > > > them into 1.2 as well, but of course there is no home for 1.2.5 yet.
> > > > > > Unlike the last time this was brought up, we now have an existing
> > > > > > example as an argument to use as a standard:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/trunk_1.2.x/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If it is good enough for core, should it not also be good enough 
> > > > > > for trinidad?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Since "https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk/"; 
> > > > > > would
> > > > > > remain untouched, this should remove any debates over JSF not being
> > > > > > supported.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Benefits:
> > > > > > 1) 1.2 snapshots possible with continuum
> > > > > > 2) 1.2 is kept up to date
> > > > > > 3) easier merge during 1.2 release time and hopefully as a result a
> > > > > > more stable product
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Andrew
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > >
> > > > further stuff:
> > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org

Reply via email to