hello werner, thank you for your additional hint. however, we already discussed this topic and there are several arguments against the integration.
this vote is just about sev-en as a stand-alone sub-project of myfaces. (aspect-el is a different topic. so let's have a separated vote.) regards, gerhard 2008/4/20, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > +1 but one addition > > since we already have an extension api project > wouldnt it be better to be integrated into orchestra > I think since orchestra is not a scope project although > its main area is scoping that sev-en should belong in there. > Think about that, I think orchestra might be the perfect place > for things like sev-en and/or aspect-el > > > Werner > > > Gerhard Petracek schrieb: > > > hello, > > > > as requested i published the source code of the sev-en preview some days > > ago (details at: [1]). > > > > we discussed whether or not we should start a new myfaces sub-project. > > > > so let's vote! > > (there will be a separated discussion + vote concerning the name.) > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > [ ] +1 for: sev-en should become a myfaces sub-project > > [ ] +0 > > [ ] -1 for: sev-en shouldn't become a myfaces sub-project > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > regards, > > gerhard > > > > [1] > > http://www.nabble.com/-proposal--jsf-validation-with-annotations-to16483341.html#a16747103 > > > > > > > > -- > > > > http://www.irian.at > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > JSF Consulting, Development and > > Courses in English and German > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
