+1 I would prefer branches/trinidad-1.0.x
Regards Bernd Simon Lessard schrieb: > +1 > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Bruno Aranda <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > +1 > > 2009/2/12 Andrew Robinson <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > +1 on both: > > trunk_1.2.x -> trunk > trunk -> ../branches/1.0.##-SNAPSHOT (where ## is the latest version > being developed) > > -Andrew > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Matthias Wessendorf > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > we discussed this already long time ago. In the past there > were no concerns with > > doing this move, to have Trinidad 1.2.x become TRUNK in our > SVN repo. > > Next week, after a round of Trinidad CORE releases, I'd like > to finally make the > > move happen. > > > > For Trinidad 1.0.x I am not sure if we want a *secondary* > trunk (trunk10x) or if > > we just make it a regular branch. Having it as a branch > doesn't mean there are > > no (maintaining) releases. Actually my plan is to have a > release for > > Trinidad 1.0.x > > on a kinda 6 month interval. Or eventually earlier. Depends on the > > load of patches/bugs > > and the requests from the MyFaces community. > > > > -Matthias > > > > -- > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > > >
