On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Bernd Bohmann <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > I would prefer branches/trinidad-1.0.x
+1 yes. On every release we also have a TAG, just in case... > > Regards > > Bernd > > Simon Lessard schrieb: >> +1 >> >> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Bruno Aranda <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> 2009/2/12 Andrew Robinson <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> >> >> +1 on both: >> >> trunk_1.2.x -> trunk >> trunk -> ../branches/1.0.##-SNAPSHOT (where ## is the latest version >> being developed) >> >> -Andrew >> >> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Matthias Wessendorf >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > we discussed this already long time ago. In the past there >> were no concerns with >> > doing this move, to have Trinidad 1.2.x become TRUNK in our >> SVN repo. >> > Next week, after a round of Trinidad CORE releases, I'd like >> to finally make the >> > move happen. >> > >> > For Trinidad 1.0.x I am not sure if we want a *secondary* >> trunk (trunk10x) or if >> > we just make it a regular branch. Having it as a branch >> doesn't mean there are >> > no (maintaining) releases. Actually my plan is to have a >> release for >> > Trinidad 1.0.x >> > on a kinda 6 month interval. Or eventually earlier. Depends on the >> > load of patches/bugs >> > and the requests from the MyFaces community. >> > >> > -Matthias >> > >> > -- >> > Matthias Wessendorf >> > >> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> > >> >> >> > > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
