+1

Matt Cooper wrote, On 2/12/2009 5:28 PM PT:
+1

On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <[email protected]> wrote:
  
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Gerhard Petracek
<[email protected]> wrote:
    
@trunk_1.2.x -> trunk:
+1

@andrew:
do you mean multiple 1.0.x branches in parallel?
      
-1 :-)

just one /branches/trinidad-1.0.x

after every release we do a TAG.
in case there is some (security/XSS) problem
in, let's say Trinidad 1.0.16 we just create a
1.0.16.1 branch out of its TAG.

-M

    
regards,
gerhard



2009/2/12 Andrew Robinson <[email protected]>
      
+1 on both:

trunk_1.2.x -> trunk
trunk -> ../branches/1.0.##-SNAPSHOT (where ## is the latest version
being developed)

-Andrew

On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <[email protected]>
wrote:
        
Hi,

we discussed this already long time ago. In the past there were no
concerns with
doing this move, to have Trinidad 1.2.x become TRUNK in our SVN repo.
Next week, after a round of Trinidad CORE releases, I'd like to finally
make the
move happen.

For Trinidad 1.0.x I am not sure if we want a *secondary* trunk
(trunk10x) or if
we just make it a regular branch. Having it as a branch doesn't mean
there are
no (maintaining) releases. Actually my plan is to have a release for
Trinidad 1.0.x
on a kinda 6 month interval. Or eventually earlier. Depends on the
load of patches/bugs
and the requests from the MyFaces community.

-Matthias

--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

          

--

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

      

--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

    

  

Reply via email to