Martin,
I agree we should look at integrating JSF 2.0 partial state saving into
Trinidad seamlessly.
It would not jump to conclusions about FaceBean just yet though.
I am currently working on getting the branch to compile and run with JSF
2.0 (pretty much along the lines
that you were suggesting in your previous e-mail).
I will enter a JIRA for that and submit a patch probably on Monday. Once
we get to a point where we can build
and test, we should start looking at features like partial state saving.
Regards,
Max Starets
Martin Koc(í wrote:
Hi,
for Trinidad2: should we deprecate FacesBean and use StateHelper
instead? I think it is the same idea:
http://myfaces.apache.org/trinidad/trinidad-api/apidocs/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/bean/FacesBean.html
https://javaserverfaces.dev.java.net/nonav/docs/2.0/javadocs/javax/faces/component/StateHelper.html
https://javaserverfaces.dev.java.net/nonav/docs/2.0/javadocs/javax/faces/component/PartialStateHolder.html
Concept is related to state saving and I think we should force Trinidad2
to use partial state saving from JSF 2.0 because that was inspired by
trinidad. Am I right?
Martin
