Re: [Trinidad2] FacesBean and JSF 2.0

[Max Starets]

Martin, Martin Kočí wrote: Hi, why I asked about partial state saving is compile-time dependency on facelets 1.1.X in TrinidadComponentHandler and StateManagerImpl, both on PARAM_BUILD_BEFORE_RESTORE param. With mojarra 2 jsf-impl and facelets 1.1.x cannot be deployed concurrently. This code will be commented out in my patch. It will all be sorted out when we integrate Trinidad's partial state saving with JSF 2.0. Few thoughts on facelets2 and trinidad2 : - change tr.taglib.xml and trh.taglib.xml root element (generated with maven plugin?) to: <facelet-taglib xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/web-facelettaglibary_2_0.xsd" version="2.0"> - rewrite TrinidadFaceletViewHandler (if it is still needed) to ViewDefinitionLanguage It is going away. - drop old facelets code from TrinidadComponentHandler, StateManagerImpl and TrinidadListenersTagRule and dependency from pom.xml - and sure more but I'm not familiar with facelets Regards, Martin Koci Max Starets píše v Pá 09. 10. 2009 v 16:50 -0400: Martin, I agree we should look at integrating JSF 2.0 partial state saving into Trinidad seamlessly. It would not jump to conclusions about FaceBean just yet though. I am currently working on getting the branch to compile and run with JSF 2.0 (pretty much along the lines that you were suggesting in your previous e-mail). I will enter a JIRA for that and submit a patch probably on Monday. Once we get to a point where we can build and test, we should start looking at features like partial state saving. Regards, Max Starets Martin Koc(í wrote: Hi, for Trinidad2: should we deprecate FacesBean and use StateHelper instead? I think it is the same idea: http://myfaces.apache.org/trinidad/trinidad-api/apidocs/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/bean/FacesBean.html https://javaserverfaces.dev.java.net/nonav/docs/2.0/javadocs/javax/faces/component/StateHelper.html https://javaserverfaces.dev.java.net/nonav/docs/2.0/javadocs/javax/faces/component/PartialStateHolder.html Concept is related to state saving and I think we should force Trinidad2 to use partial state saving from JSF 2.0 because that was inspired by trinidad. Am I right? Martin