Hi,

why I asked about partial state saving is compile-time dependency on
facelets 1.1.X in TrinidadComponentHandler and StateManagerImpl, both on
PARAM_BUILD_BEFORE_RESTORE param. With mojarra 2  jsf-impl and facelets
1.1.x cannot be deployed concurrently.

Few thoughts on facelets2 and trinidad2 :

- change tr.taglib.xml and trh.taglib.xml root element (generated with
maven  plugin?) to:

<facelet-taglib xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee";
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
              xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/web-facelettaglibary_2_0.xsd";
              version="2.0">

- rewrite TrinidadFaceletViewHandler (if it is still needed) to
ViewDefinitionLanguage

- drop old facelets code  from TrinidadComponentHandler,
StateManagerImpl and TrinidadListenersTagRule and dependency from
pom.xml

- and sure more but I'm not familiar with facelets


Regards,

Martin Koci


Max Starets píše v Pá 09. 10. 2009 v 16:50 -0400:
> Martin,
> 
> I agree we should look at integrating JSF 2.0 partial state saving into 
> Trinidad seamlessly.
> It would not jump to conclusions about FaceBean just yet though.
> 
> I am currently working on getting the branch to compile and run with JSF 
> 2.0 (pretty much along the lines
> that you were suggesting in your previous e-mail).
> 
> I will enter a JIRA for that and submit a patch probably on Monday. Once 
> we get to a point where we can build
> and test, we should start looking at features like partial state saving.
> 
> Regards,
> Max Starets
> 
> Martin Koc(í wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > for Trinidad2: should we deprecate FacesBean and use StateHelper
> > instead? I think it is the same idea:
> >
> > http://myfaces.apache.org/trinidad/trinidad-api/apidocs/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/bean/FacesBean.html
> >
> > https://javaserverfaces.dev.java.net/nonav/docs/2.0/javadocs/javax/faces/component/StateHelper.html
> > https://javaserverfaces.dev.java.net/nonav/docs/2.0/javadocs/javax/faces/component/PartialStateHolder.html
> >
> > Concept is related to state saving and I think we should force Trinidad2
> > to use partial state saving from JSF 2.0 because that was inspired by
> > trinidad. Am I right?
> >
> >
> > Martin
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >   
> 
> 

Reply via email to