Hi, in order to work on Trinidad 2.0 and 303 support (yeah need to check what Gerhard did for extVal) I took a quick look at the UIInput.
I noticed a few lines containing a call like this: => BeanValidator.isAvailable This is a public field which is only there in MyFaces, not in the JSF 2.0 API ([1]). I know that the entire handling of checking if there is a JSR 303 implementation is a little bit ugly, but I am not sure if we should introduce such a "public" field to the BeanValidator validator class. => wouldn't be good if extensions would start to rely on this field; I guess not there on the RI ;-) => does this violate the TCK ? Or would it be ? I am not sure here two, as it is a public field Maybe we should make the make the check become a private thing ? -Matthias [1] http://java.sun.com/javaee/javaserverfaces/2.0/docs/api/index.html -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
